From: Tom O. <tm...@eb...> - 2006-09-25 13:34:47
|
Stian Soiland wrote: > Tom Oinn wrote: >> Stuart (I think), >> >> Is there a reason for the WebScavengerHelper to be in the scufl-ui >> package rather than with the other scavenger stuff? If not I'd like to >> move it, it doesn't seem to belong there. > > I think there were some problems with the constructor and getting it > SPI-ifized, but I might be wrong. I don't see any reason why you cannot > move it, as long as you get it to work afterwards ;=) > > This scavenger also don't have a matching processor (as it collects both > nested workflows and WSDLs) - so it is not very well defined in the > current hierarchy where it would fit in. > > The getDefault method of the web scavenger needs the scavengerTree - > probably to do those fancy "status" messages in the tree etc. Yeah, it needs them to notify progress. Really all the scavengers should do this, maybe we should add a callback style interface? Anyway, for now I'm going to move it to the other module. Tom |