[Tapper-develop] Re: Tapper-develop digest, Vol 1 #5 - 1 msg

[Sean Y. <sea...@ho...>]

Package naming should be more generic. com.xxx <-- xxx should be a personal 
identifier, not necessarily your product. If you're going to change all the 
package names anyway, I suggest using .org - since this is an 'open' 
project.

org.samba.client.gui <-- looks organized and concise

Oh darn, looks as if tapper.org is an actual domain name, as is .com and 
.net.  :(

BTW: there is also a gregb.com registered.

Couldn't you easily grep through the source tree and replace all 'gregb' 
with 'somename'?  Whatever you choose, it should be unique.

Here's a sure solution, use 'net.sourceforge.tapper.*'

net.sourceforge.tapper.main (tapper.java lives there)
net.sourceforge.tapper.actions
net.sourceforge.tapper.util
net.sourceforge.tapper.gui
net.sourceforge.tapper.tunings
net.sourceforge.tapper.dialogs


Looks like I've made a circular argument here.  :()

-Sean





----Original Message Follows----
From: tap...@li...
Reply-To: tap...@li...
To: tap...@li...
Subject: Tapper-develop digest, Vol 1 #5 - 1 msg
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 12:32:41 -0700

Send Tapper-develop mailing list submissions to
	tap...@li...

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tapper-develop
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	tap...@li...

You can reach the person managing the list at
	tap...@li...

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Tapper-develop digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Package name change.  What do you think? (Greg Brouelette)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:48:46 -0700
From: Greg Brouelette <gbr...@ho...>
To: tap...@li...
Subject: [Tapper-develop] Package name change.  What do you think?

I'm thinking that I want to get rid of the gregb mid-level package name.

I think the new package name structure could be: com.tapper. with gui, util,
tunings, etc under that.  However, we also have a 3rd level tapper directory
called "tapper" and a main class called "Tapper" so the main class would 
then
become :

com.tapper.tapper.Tapper

Which doesn't make me dance.

So, what if I moved the classes in the com.greb.tapper package into the
com.gregb.gui package?  It would then become com.tapper.gui and the main 
class
will then become com.tapper.gui.Tapper

OR

Should we eliminate the mid level package name all together?

Let's debate.

GB



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Tapper-develop mailing list
Tap...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tapper-develop


End of Tapper-develop Digest_______________________________________________
Tapper-develop mailing list
Tap...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/tapper-develop

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.