[Tapper-develop] Package name change. What do you think?
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
druleeparsec
From: Greg B. <gbr...@ho...> - 2000-10-14 00:51:00
|
I'm thinking that I want to get rid of the gregb mid-level package name. I think the new package name structure could be: com.tapper. with gui, util, tunings, etc under that. However, we also have a 3rd level tapper directory called "tapper" and a main class called "Tapper" so the main class would then become : com.tapper.tapper.Tapper Which doesn't make me dance. So, what if I moved the classes in the com.greb.tapper package into the com.gregb.gui package? It would then become com.tapper.gui and the main class will then become com.tapper.gui.Tapper OR Should we eliminate the mid level package name all together? Let's debate. GB |