From: Patrick O. <Pat...@gm...> - 2008-05-14 16:20:25
|
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:53 +0200, Andrea Gazzaniga wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Patrick Ohly <Pat...@gm...> wrote: > > Hopefully the situation will improve with the next Funambol server > > releases, which will have better iCalendar 2.0 support. Whether > > myFUNAMBOL will offer that remains to be seen: I asked the developers, > > but didn't get a reply. > > Perhaps the answer was not clear:the timezone support is under > development and so far it is foreseen for Capri release. > Everything will go on myFunambol, so the question is not 'whether' but > ' when' My question wasn't about time zone support (which was answered), but rather about the iCalendar 2.0 format itself. Here is the unanswered question again, in case that you missed it on the developers list: Will there be a sync URI which sends and receives iCalendar 2.0 or will the normal calendar URI be changed so that it sends iCalendar 2.0 when the client indicates that it can only handle iCalendar 2.0? >From a user's perspective the question is: do they have to reconfigure their clients (SyncEvolution and Thunderbird) to use a different URI, or will everything work automatically after the upgrade of myFUNAMBOL? BTW, is the spelling myFunambol or myFUNAMBOL? -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- Pat...@gm... http://www.estamos.de/ |