From: Mark W. <ma...@cl...> - 2005-02-08 21:23:10
|
> One question: is there any reason, licensing or otherwise, for us not > to also steal high-quality code from FreeBSD? Bear in mind there are actually two BSD licenses... > The BSD's already use > GNU-licensed code Yes but only in userspace. > and I believe the Linux kernel has used BSD-licensed > code as well. Yes, that's true, although I haven't seen large amounts of BSD code around the kernel. > I'm not aware of any legal issues involved in intermixing > the two The original license had 4 clauses. It is "free" but it is not compatible with GPLv2 because there is an advertising clause. See http://www.fsf.org/licenses/info/BSD_4Clause.html After some time, Berkeley changed all the code they had copyright to the 3 clause license, dropping the advertising clause. See http://www.fsf.org/licenses/info/BSD_3Clause.html There is still other 4 clause licensed code in various parts of the BSD kernel, however. Off the top of my head, the USB stack code is 4 clause licensed, there are probably other bits. > Anything else? It seems like a good idea to pick and choose whatever is relevant from other projects. That's a big OSS win, after all ;-) Cheers, Mark |