Re: [sword-app-tech] Difference between the Atom RFC and an example in the SWORD2 spec

[Mark J. <mj...@sf...>]

Hi, 

Pinging on this question from Oct. 16... 

----- Original Message -----

> Hi,

> I have a question about the Atom entry used to create a resource under SWORD
> 2.

> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt, section 4.1.2 indicates that atom:entry
> elements must contain either one atom:content child element or "at least one
> atom:link element with a rel attribute value of 'alternate'." However, the
> example Atom entry provided at
> http://swordapp.github.io/SWORDv2-Profile/SWORDProfile.html#protocoloperations_creatingresource_entry
> contains neither. Does SWORD2 relax this requirement of Atom or is the
> example incomplete?

> Thanks,

> Mark

> Mark Jordan
> Head of Library Systems
> W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
> Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
> Voice: 778.782.5753 / Fax: 778.782.3023 / Skype: mark.jordan50
> mj...@sf...

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
> Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
> Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
> Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
> _______________________________________________
> sword-app-tech mailing list
> swo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-tech