From: Richard J. <ri...@co...> - 2014-07-10 08:54:53
|
Hi Folks, A couple of emails about doing releases and merging pull requests have prompted me to bring up the issue of code governance for our various sword libraries. Essentially, I'm concerned that I've become an unnecessary bottleneck for these libraries, and wonder what would be the best solution to that. My current position is that I use the sword code myself in a variety of contexts but I have very little spare time on top of client-work to manage the core code (accepting pull requests, responding on list, making releases, etc). Obviously people are free to fork and modify the code as needed, but maybe it would be better if more of us had admin rights on the repositories? I'm hoping, also, that there will be more funding at this end at some point for some more "core" development, but opportunities are currently vague, so I don't think there's any point in holding out for it. Instead it seems much better to try to increase community engagement with the code and try to sustain it that way. What do you all think? Does anyone have a burning desire to be a sword "committer"? Cheers, Richard -- Richard Jones, Founder, Cottage Labs t: @richard_d_jones, @cottagelabs w: http://cottagelabs.com |