From: Antony C. [awc] <aw...@ab...> - 2008-08-29 08:29:26
|
Yes I think if it's seen as useful we need to know in what way. Expressing a preference where a less common schema/sip-package or format is partially supported isn't really a problem, however the danger is that a server might declare that it supports METS/SWAP but the outcome may not be clear. > > 6/ Pablo at MS requested a "preferred format" feature in the > collection > > element of the service document, or alternatively a @preference > attribute > > containing an ordinal number. Would others find this useful? > > I think it would be useful. Can we come up with some concrete > examples where > this is required or very useful in order to help justify it? > > Cheers, > > > Stuart > _________________________________________________________________ > > Gwasanaethau Gwybodaeth Information Services > Prifysgol Aberystwyth Aberystwyth University > > E-bost / E-mail: Stu...@ab... > Ffon / Tel: (01970) 622860 > _________________________________________________________________ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > sword-app-tech mailing list > swo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-tech |