From: Jason Stewart <jason.e.stewart@gm...> - 2006-01-24 11:39:40
If the regexp code is not to be included, then perhaps we should
remove the entry in CHANGES.current - as opposed to simply marking the
change as 'disabled'. I think it is likely to confuse someone.
I'm still not opposed to including the current work, but if it has
been decided not to include it then so be it.
Should we begin a discussion of how to include it for the next release?