From: William S F. <ws...@fu...> - 2013-12-18 00:23:30
|
On 07/10/13 08:06, William S Fulton wrote: > Now we are full steam ahead for SWIG 3, I suggest the work is mostly > polished off on the original branches. The status of it can be seen from > the Travis tests, which I have turned on where I can. Below is a list of > Github branches of where the SWIG 3 code is coming from: > > > C++11 - William Fulton > https://github.com/swig/swig/tree/gsoc2009-matevz > > Nested classes - Vladimir Kalinin > Github patch > > Doxygen - Marko Klopcic > https://github.com/swig/swig/tree/gsoc2012-doxygen > > Javascript - Oliver Buchtala > https://github.com/oliver----/swig-v8/ > > Perl improvements - Robert Stone > https://github.com/swig/swig/tree/talby-perl5-improvements > > .NET 2.0 - Brant Kyser > Github patch > > Scilab - Simon Marchetto > https://github.com/swig/swig/commits/gsoc2012-scilab > > Finally,Swati has expressed an interest to me in getting Objective C > done too. > Objective C - Swati Sharma > https://github.com/swig/swig/tree/gsoc2012-objc > > I'll do the merges to master and would appreciate the authors letting me > know when the Travis tests are green and ready for review and merge. > I'll be working on the C++11 and Doxygen branches next unless something > comes up read as ready to merge. > Status update: The two big ones, C++11 and nested are done and being polished off for 3.0.0. Doxygen might have to wait until 3.0.1 as I havn't had a chance to look at it. .NET 2 is done. I need updates for Javascript, Perl and Scilab. I havn't heard anything at all about Objective C from Swati, so assume this won't make it. The important changes to include in 3.0.0 are non-backwards compatible by default changes. Anything else can go into a 3.0.x release. Does anyone else have anything that should go into 3.0.0 apart from the patches in Github? All I know of is some Lua changes from Artem. William |