From: Daniel P. <phi...@ar...> - 2002-10-22 23:04:22
|
I built and ran sweep-0.5.8 on debian sid, which mainly required installing the -dev packages for such things as tdb, gtk, etc. However there is some kind of error in the autoconf-generated configure file that prevents detection of libtdb. I didn't delve into the precise cause, but the following crude patch (i.e., ignore result of tdb detection) allows configuration to complete successfully. --- configure.old 2002-10-23 00:07:22.000000000 +0200 +++ configure.new 2002-10-23 02:23:23.000000000 +0200 @@ -9435,7 +9435,7 @@ echo $ac_n "checking for tdb_open in -ltdb""... $ac_c" 1>&6 echo "configure:9437: checking for tdb_open in -ltdb" >&5 ac_lib_var=`echo tdb'_'tdb_open | sed 'y%./+-%__p_%'` -if eval "test \"`echo '$''{'ac_cv_lib_$ac_lib_var'+set}'`\" = set"; then +if eval "test \"`echo '$''{'ac_cv_lib_$ac_lib_var'+set}'`\" = XXXset"; then echo $ac_n "(cached) $ac_c" 1>&6 else ac_save_LIBS="$LIBS" -- Daniel |
From: Conrad P. <co...@ve...> - 2002-10-22 23:34:37
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:05:11AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > I built and ran sweep-0.5.8 on debian sid, which mainly required installing > the -dev packages for such things as tdb, gtk, etc. > > However there is some kind of error in the autoconf-generated configure file > that prevents detection of libtdb. I didn't delve into the precise cause, > but the following crude patch (i.e., ignore result of tdb detection) allows > configuration to complete successfully. eek; Hi Daniel, that's bizarre. I run sid too (with the tdb-dev package), and can't reproduce this, but I'll try to look into it. Anand, do you know what the problem is? Conrad. > > --- configure.old 2002-10-23 00:07:22.000000000 +0200 > +++ configure.new 2002-10-23 02:23:23.000000000 +0200 > @@ -9435,7 +9435,7 @@ > echo $ac_n "checking for tdb_open in -ltdb""... $ac_c" 1>&6 > echo "configure:9437: checking for tdb_open in -ltdb" >&5 > ac_lib_var=`echo tdb'_'tdb_open | sed 'y%./+-%__p_%'` > -if eval "test \"`echo '$''{'ac_cv_lib_$ac_lib_var'+set}'`\" = set"; then > +if eval "test \"`echo '$''{'ac_cv_lib_$ac_lib_var'+set}'`\" = XXXset"; then > echo $ac_n "(cached) $ac_c" 1>&6 > else > ac_save_LIBS="$LIBS" > > -- > Daniel |
From: Daniel P. <phi...@ar...> - 2002-10-23 01:36:23
|
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 01:34, Conrad Parker wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:05:11AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > I built and ran sweep-0.5.8 on debian sid, which mainly required installing > > the -dev packages for such things as tdb, gtk, etc. > > > > However there is some kind of error in the autoconf-generated configure file > > that prevents detection of libtdb. I didn't delve into the precise cause, > > but the following crude patch (i.e., ignore result of tdb detection) allows > > configuration to complete successfully. > > eek; Hi Daniel, > > that's bizarre. I run sid too (with the tdb-dev package), and can't > reproduce this, but I'll try to look into it. > > Anand, do you know what the problem is? > > Conrad. Double eek. I tested further and found that the original configure file does in fact complete successfully on my system now, and so the patch above is bogus. I can no longer reproduce the problem either, so we will write it off to cosmic rays (more likely a temporary file left hanging around from one of the earlier missing-library config failures, or similar). Whatever, it's now in good shape for hacking... Fine work, by the way. Going from version in 5.6 in Sid to your current 5.8 already eliminates the exact glitches I was going to whine about ;-) -- Daniel |
From: Conrad P. <co...@ve...> - 2002-10-23 01:39:41
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:36:25AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Wednesday 23 October 2002 01:34, Conrad Parker wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:05:11AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > I built and ran sweep-0.5.8 on debian sid, which mainly required installing > > > the -dev packages for such things as tdb, gtk, etc. > > > > > > However there is some kind of error in the autoconf-generated configure file > > > that prevents detection of libtdb. I didn't delve into the precise cause, > > > but the following crude patch (i.e., ignore result of tdb detection) allows > > > configuration to complete successfully. > > > > eek; Hi Daniel, > > > > that's bizarre. I run sid too (with the tdb-dev package), and can't > > reproduce this, but I'll try to look into it. > > > > Anand, do you know what the problem is? > > > > Conrad. > > Double eek. I tested further and found that the original configure file does > in fact complete successfully on my system now, and so the patch above is bogus. > I can no longer reproduce the problem either, so we will write it off to cosmic > rays (more likely a temporary file left hanging around from one of the earlier > missing-library config failures, or similar). > > Whatever, it's now in good shape for hacking... > > Fine work, by the way. Going from version in 5.6 in Sid to your current 5.8 > already eliminates the exact glitches I was going to whine about ;-) that's all excellent to hear! I'm getting coffee! 0.5.9 is out now btw, as of an hour ago or so ;) Conrad. |
From: Anand K. <ak...@de...> - 2002-10-23 02:07:55
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:39:23AM +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > > 0.5.9 is out now btw, as of an hour ago or so ;) > Great, it looks like not at all the autobuilders rae going to do 0.5.6 (the only reason I've not been uploading), so I'll respin a package tonight. Anand -- `` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada |
From: Conrad P. <co...@ve...> - 2002-10-23 03:37:53
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:05:04PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:39:23AM +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > > > > 0.5.9 is out now btw, as of an hour ago or so ;) > > > > Great, it looks like not at all the autobuilders rae going to do 0.5.6 > (the only reason I've not been uploading), so I'll respin a package > tonight. cool make sure to get all the new depends of course: libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libspeex-dev, libmad0-dev the API version for libvorbis changed "recently", breaking ogg123 in testing. note that building sweep will configure itself correctly against either version -- ie. the libvorbis in sid and sarge is different to that in woody apparently speex went into unstable last week too so it's all good :) K. |
From: Anand K. <ak...@de...> - 2002-10-23 05:06:34
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:37:37PM +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:05:04PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:39:23AM +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > > > > > > 0.5.9 is out now btw, as of an hour ago or so ;) > > > > > > > Great, it looks like not at all the autobuilders rae going to do 0.5.6 > > (the only reason I've not been uploading), so I'll respin a package > > tonight. > > cool > > make sure to get all the new depends of course: libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, > libspeex-dev, libmad0-dev Yup, got those. Although I am wondering why vorbis_block_clear is SIGSEGV'ing in the autoconf detection code -- that is why the detection test fails btw. > the API version for libvorbis changed "recently", breaking ogg123 in > testing. note that building sweep will configure itself correctly against > either version -- ie. the libvorbis in sid and sarge is different to that > in woody > > apparently speex went into unstable last week too so it's all good :) I'm trying to let things become quiescent long enough so that a reasonably newer version than 0.1.1 can get into testing. Anand -- `` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada |
From: Conrad P. <co...@ve...> - 2002-10-23 05:43:17
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > Yup, got those. Although I am wondering why vorbis_block_clear is > SIGSEGV'ing in the autoconf detection code -- that is why the detection > test fails btw. um -- do you mean that that is why the XIPH_PATH_VORBIS() check fails? that's confused me as it's provided by libvorbis, hence I have to do the workaround. I think it works on libvorbis in woody, not completely sure tho. is it different on testing and unstable? > > the API version for libvorbis changed "recently", breaking ogg123 in > > testing. note that building sweep will configure itself correctly against > > either version -- ie. the libvorbis in sid and sarge is different to that > > in woody > > > > apparently speex went into unstable last week too so it's all good :) > > I'm trying to let things become quiescent long enough so that a > reasonably newer version than 0.1.1 can get into testing. I hope you're not waiting for sweep development to become quiescent ;-) K. |
From: Anand K. <ak...@de...> - 2002-10-23 05:53:45
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:43:07PM +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > > > Yup, got those. Although I am wondering why vorbis_block_clear is > > SIGSEGV'ing in the autoconf detection code -- that is why the detection > > test fails btw. > > um -- do you mean that that is why the XIPH_PATH_VORBIS() check fails? Yup. > that's confused me as it's provided by libvorbis, hence I have to do the > workaround. > I think it works on libvorbis in woody, not completely sure tho. Haven't checked in woody, will do a bit later and let you know. > is it different on testing and unstable? Appears not: akumria@auric:~$ madison libvorbis libvorbis | 1.0rc3-1 | stable | source libvorbis | 1.0.0-1 | testing | source libvorbis | 1.0.0-1 | unstable | source > > > the API version for libvorbis changed "recently", breaking ogg123 in > > > testing. note that building sweep will configure itself correctly against > > > either version -- ie. the libvorbis in sid and sarge is different to that > > > in woody Well according to the above they are the same ... > > > apparently speex went into unstable last week too so it's all good :) > > > > I'm trying to let things become quiescent long enough so that a > > reasonably newer version than 0.1.1 can get into testing. > > I hope you're not waiting for sweep development to become quiescent ;-) Of coure not! I bet you had to look up the meaning of the word ;-) Anand -- `` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada |
From: Conrad P. <co...@ve...> - 2002-10-23 06:02:42
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:53:38PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > I hope you're not waiting for sweep development to become quiescent ;-) > > Of coure not! I bet you had to look up the meaning of the word ;-) > and I might be looking up the meaning of "a jug of James Squire amber ale" fairly soon :) K. |
From: Daniel P. <phi...@ar...> - 2002-10-23 03:45:25
|
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 03:39, Conrad Parker wrote: > 0.5.9 is out now btw, as of an hour ago or so ;) Built and (superficially) tested here, works fine. -- Daniel |
From: Patrick S. <psh...@bo...> - 2002-10-23 11:51:40
|
Conrad do you have any plans to jack sweep? That would be a great thing to do for the community. Then we would have at least one sample editor and dj capable app to use. I'm hoping that you will not find the api hard to use. Everyone mentions how well thought out it is. I guess the problem is changing to a callback style internally. -- Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. For the discerning hardware connoisseur Http://www.boosthardware.com Http://www.djcj.org - The Linux Audio Users guide ======================================== "Um...symbol_get and symbol_put... They're kindof like does anyone remember like get_symbol and put_symbol I think we used to have..." - Rusty Russell in his talk on the module subsystem |
From: Zenaan H. <ze...@ge...> - 2002-10-23 22:38:48
|
I am currently starting to work through the various bits of code. I've really only ever done Java programming, but it's semantically similar so it shouldn't take too much. Of course, someone who already knows either the jack or the sweep code could all but certainly do it more quickly than me - and if someone does, I'd like to know they are on to it, so I don't spend a whole lot of time doing what someone else has already done. Naturally. I'm sure I can find something worthwhile to hack on. On the other hand, if people are prepared to wait a few weeks, then I might be looking for some testers. cheers zen On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 22:50, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Conrad do you have any plans to jack sweep? > > That would be a great thing to do for the community. Then we would have > at least one sample editor and dj capable app to use. > > I'm hoping that you will not find the api hard to use. Everyone mentions > how well thought out it is. I guess the problem is changing to a > callback style internally. > > > > > -- > Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. > For the discerning hardware connoisseur > Http://www.boosthardware.com > Http://www.djcj.org - The Linux Audio Users guide > ======================================== > > "Um...symbol_get and symbol_put... They're > kindof like does anyone remember like get_symbol > and put_symbol I think we used to have..." > - Rusty Russell in his talk on the module subsystem > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en > _______________________________________________ > sweep-devel mailing list > swe...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sweep-devel > -- Mr Zenaan Harkness, Manager, VIDC Phone: +678 25 151 Fax: +678 25 178 Mobile: +678 45 179 Please respect the confidentiality of this email. |
From: Patrick S. <psh...@bo...> - 2002-10-24 16:18:03
|
Zenaan Harkness wrote: > I am currently starting to work through the various bits of code. > > I've really only ever done Java programming, but it's semantically > similar so it shouldn't take too much. > > Of course, someone who already knows either the jack or the sweep code > could all but certainly do it more quickly than me - and if someone > does, I'd like to know they are on to it, so I don't spend a whole lot > of time doing what someone else has already done. Naturally. I'm sure I > can find something worthwhile to hack on. > > On the other hand, if people are prepared to wait a few weeks, then I > might be looking for some testers. > Excellent. I look forward to your progress. On a side note I am getting two copies of every mail. Why is that? Is anyone else seeing this? -- Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. For the discerning hardware connoisseur Http://www.boosthardware.com Http://www.djcj.org - The Linux Audio Users guide ======================================== "Um...symbol_get and symbol_put... They're kindof like does anyone remember like get_symbol and put_symbol I think we used to have..." - Rusty Russell in his talk on the module subsystem |
From: Zenaan H. <ze...@ge...> - 2002-10-24 21:45:29
|
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 03:16, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > I am currently starting to work through the various bits of code. > > > > I've really only ever done Java programming, but it's semantically > > similar so it shouldn't take too much. > > > > Of course, someone who already knows either the jack or the sweep code > > could all but certainly do it more quickly than me - and if someone > > does, I'd like to know they are on to it, so I don't spend a whole lot > > of time doing what someone else has already done. Naturally. I'm sure I > > can find something worthwhile to hack on. > > > > On the other hand, if people are prepared to wait a few weeks, then I > > might be looking for some testers. > > > > Excellent. I look forward to your progress. > > On a side note I am getting two copies of every mail. Why is that? Is > anyone else seeing this? Look at the headers in the email you get more than one copy of, and see where it is sent. Sometimes I get 3, but that because it comes to me from 3 ways, eg: ardour-dev, jackit-devel, ardour-users, sweep-devel and/ or me personally... cheers zen |
From: Patrick S. <psh...@bo...> - 2002-10-24 22:23:26
|
Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 03:16, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > >>Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> >>>I am currently starting to work through the various bits of code. >>> >>>I've really only ever done Java programming, but it's semantically >>>similar so it shouldn't take too much. >>> >>>Of course, someone who already knows either the jack or the sweep code >>>could all but certainly do it more quickly than me - and if someone >>>does, I'd like to know they are on to it, so I don't spend a whole lot >>>of time doing what someone else has already done. Naturally. I'm sure I >>>can find something worthwhile to hack on. >>> >>>On the other hand, if people are prepared to wait a few weeks, then I >>>might be looking for some testers. >>> >> >>Excellent. I look forward to your progress. >> >>On a side note I am getting two copies of every mail. Why is that? Is >>anyone else seeing this? > > > Look at the headers in the email you get more than one copy of, and see > where it is sent. Sometimes I get 3, but that because it comes to me > from 3 ways, eg: ardour-dev, jackit-devel, ardour-users, sweep-devel > and/ or me personally... > This is for mails only to this list. I'm wondering if somehow I have subscribed two times with the same address. Shouldn't be possible though. -- Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. For the discerning hardware connoisseur Http://www.boosthardware.com Http://www.djcj.org - The Linux Audio Users guide ======================================== "Um...symbol_get and symbol_put... They're kindof like does anyone remember like get_symbol and put_symbol I think we used to have..." - Rusty Russell in his talk on the module subsystem |
From: kevin e. <kev...@ya...> - 2002-10-26 00:29:25
|
Hi all - Are there any immediate plans for adding "fade-in/out" or any envelope editing to Sweep's "Edit" list? I realize this is potentially mundane programming task when compared to all of the cool stuff Sweep has added recently (hats off to Conrad!), but I still miss this core editing function almost every time I open it. Kevin __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ |
From: Conrad P. <co...@ve...> - 2002-10-26 02:49:12
|
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 05:29:17PM -0700, kevin ernste wrote: > Hi all - > > Are there any immediate plans for adding "fade-in/out" > or any envelope editing to Sweep's "Edit" list? > > I realize this is potentially mundane programming task > when compared to all of the cool stuff Sweep has added > recently (hats off to Conrad!), but I still miss this > core editing function almost every time I open it. > there's a half-implemented "paste crossfade" in the experimental branch (./configure --enable-experimental), but that might not be quite what you're after. there's a secret library and planning document (ok, it's actually a released, working library and a published paper) at: http://www.metadecks.org/software/axel/ that outlines the plans for parameter envelopes, caching etc. Conrad. |