Originally created by: alex.jar...@gmail.com
Originally owned by: cmpilato
On
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.treeconflicts.html
in chapter 2 paragraph "An example Tree Conflict" 9th example right after
"In case you agree, you can delete bar.c and mark the tree conflict as
resolved:" reads:
$ svn remove --force code/bar.c
D code/bar.c
$ svn resolve --accept=working code/bar.c
Resolved conflicted state of 'code/bar.c'
I believe in this example this should read
$ svn remove --force code/bar.c
D code/bar.c
$ svn resolve --accept=working code/baz.c
Resolved conflicted state of 'code/baz.c'
View and moderate all "tickets Discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Tickets"
Originally posted by: cmpilato
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Owner: cmpilato
View and moderate all "tickets Discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Tickets"
Originally posted by: cmpilato
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Summary: ch02: Wrong file name in tree conflict example
Labels: Milestone-en-1.6
View and moderate all "tickets Discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Tickets"
Originally posted by: cmpilato
Really? But if I'm following the example correctly, it's actually code/bar.c that's in conflict, not code/baz.c.
stsp, am I missing something here?
Cc: s...@elego.de
View and moderate all "tickets Discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Tickets"
Originally posted by: cmpilato
After further review, I believe the text is accurate.
Status: Invalid