[Svgdomcsharp-developers] Fwd: some points ..

[Don X. <do...@ho...>]

Stefan is having problems emailing the list from his provider.  I'm 
forwarding this for him.


>From: "Goessner / MecXpert" <goe...@me...>
>To: "Don XML" <do...@ho...>, 
><svg...@li...>
>Subject: some points ..
>Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:28:51 +0100
>
>hi,
>
>.. sorry, i can read all mails (twice:-), but seem to have problems 
>replying
>..
>
>1) i would also prefer the .net naming conventions.
>a) Pascal-casing for namespaces, classes, structs, delegates, enums .. i.e.
>'Svg', 'Xml', 'Uri' ?
>b) Camel-casing for variables ?
>c) member variables with or without leading 'm_' ?
>
>2) lists, arrays .. i would prefer to also implementer indexers parallel to
>'item', 'getItem'  methods.
>
>3) properties instead of getters and setters .. yes absolutely.
>
>4) i would also vote for introducing enums instead of java constants.
>
>5) i don't know java very well, but i know that events are implemented
>totally different. should we use delegates? i vote for those.
>
>6) maybe the NDOC documentation tool would help ..
>http://ndoc.sourceforge.net/
>
>8) i also recommend lutz roeders .net reflector ..
>http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/
>
>9) i would like to start with the interfaces in chapter 7 of the spec
>'Coordinate Systems, Transformations and Units' and the implementations of
>the underlying classes.
>
>10) exceptions .. if we have to decide from which to derive .. as a rule of
>thumb, we should use the most lowerlevel class/interface until there is a
>good reason to derive from a higherlevel class/interface.
>
>11) i would vote for also to support project makefiles .. i am quite
>puristic and still working with the command line window.
>
>12) i work with the simple but good EditPlus editor, but have installed
>SharpDevelop also. i will migrate, if we decide for it.
>--
>stefan
>
>
>




_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.