Re: [Sv1-devel] A few questions ...
Brought to you by:
cannam
From: Ólafur E. <ol...@gm...> - 2017-09-18 20:04:31
|
Regarding moving to Git and the hg sub repo problem: Are the subrepositories every used on their own (in a different project?) Could you dump the project onto github as a fresh one with no history and no subrepos and keep repository on code.soundsoftware.ac.uk locked for the archaeologist? It's not an ideal solution, but is it worth the effort to try to include the history and repos on github? A developer interested in the project has to be incredibly dedicated if he's to fight both Hg and Qt oddities at the same time. >I would like to get the repo (at the very least) mirrored on github, >primarily because at the moment the situation about where to file and >discuss issues is so unfriendly to new contributors. There are obstacles >to do with the heavy use SV makes of Mercurial subrepositories. I've >been looking into various options for dealing with that, but that work >s still pending. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Chris Cannam <ca...@al... > wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Apr 2017, at 23:02, Ólafur Egilsson wrote: > > 1. Where is the best place to ask SV related (not vamp) dev questions? > > This list is not a bad place. It doesn't get much traffic at the moment, > but your questions should be noticed. > > > 2. Is there a build instructions somewhere (apart from INSTALL.txt). > > For Windows there is this wiki page: > https://code.soundsoftware.ac.uk/projects/sonic-visualiser/ > wiki/WindowsBuild30 > > I've also just updated the INSTALL file in the repo with a few more > notes. I'm intending to make an updated source tarball with more details > in this file than the 3.0.2 one had, so please do let me know what other > obstacles you have run into. > > > 3. Do you take code submissions from the community (for bugs and > > features)? > > Yes. > > > If so, do we have a formal/ideal protocol for such submissions > > (discussion, code style, how to submit, etc?) > > Discussion here or in a tracker issue (on SourceForge for example) is > good. Code style is primarily follow what exists already (camel case, > 4-char indentation, avoid tab characters, opening brace at end of > leading line etc). > > As for submissions, I'd say in the first instance send patches (here or > off-list). Then we can work out repo access. > > > (I do have a few lines of code submission related to playback which makes > > my life much easier when transcribing a solo. I think it might be useful > > for others). > > Sounds good. > > > 4. Has there been any discussion on moving to Git > > I would like to get the repo (at the very least) mirrored on github, > primarily because at the moment the situation about where to file and > discuss issues is so unfriendly to new contributors. There are obstacles > to do with the heavy use SV makes of Mercurial subrepositories. I've > been looking into various options for dealing with that, but that work > is still pending. > > > Chris > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Sv1-devel mailing list > Sv1...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sv1-devel > |