[Structuredtext-develop] option lists
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
goodger
From: Alan J. <ja...@po...> - 2002-02-22 23:22:17
|
I don't see the value in the "dashes are implicit" behavior. It loses the ability to document non-GNU-style option lists. What does it gain? We don't want to spend complexity dealing with every weird option-parsing behavior out there, but we don't have to. Just leave the dashes in, and people can use option lists no matter what style of parsing they use - or what style of parsing is used by whatever they're documenting, it's not necessarily a choice that the document author can make. There's a huge amount of existing software that uses single-dash long options. In the DOS world, using a single slash before both short and long options is nearly universal. Alan |