Re: GSOC:Microproject

[Masatake Y. <ya...@re...>]

How about allowing a user to define ones' own class in ~/.strace?

(cat ~/.strace)

classes:
	- name: xattr
	  - syscall: setxattr
	  - syscall: lsetxattr
	  - syscall: fsetxattr
	  - syscall: getxattr
	  - syscall: listxattr
	  - syscall: removexattr
	- name: setxattr
	  - syscall: setxattr
	  - syscall: lsetxattr
	  - syscall: fsetxattr
	
So you can do -e trace=%xattr or -e traec=%setxattr as you want.

However, I think we cannot say thie extension a microproject:-P

Masatake YAMATO



> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:07:59 +0530
> Abhishek Tiwari <era...@gm...> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I want to work on microproject
>> 
>> extend -e trace=class syntax with new classes
>> 
>> 
>> I have gone through mailing list. Is following grouping ok
>> 
>> {,l,f}setxattr           TRACE_SETXATTR  TFX
>> 
>> 
>> -e trace=%setxattr
> 
> This is a good start, but from what I see, maybe this group is too
> small, maybe all the syscalls that deals with xattr should be a better
> idea, something like -e trace=%xattr.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gabriel Laskar
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Strace-devel mailing list
> Str...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel