Thanks Rob! Well done :)
Yes, that is much easier. This is done now!
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 10:55 +0100, Fabien Chéreau wrote:
> Ha yes so it should be declared in StelModule.hpp instead.
> On Dec 18, 2007 2:25 AM, Rob Spearman <email@example.com>
> StelModuleMgr::selectedObjectChangeCallBack requires access to
> the new
> select action enum. So if this is declared in StelObjMgr, how
> StelModuleMgr get access to the enum?
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 01:03 +0100, Fabien Chéreau wrote:
> > I would prefer an enum. (Declared in the StelObjectMgr
> > Fabien
> > On Dec 17, 2007 6:30 PM, Rob Spearman
> > wrote:
> > Do you want me to use this approach? Or turn "add"
> into an
> > enum for the
> > action: add, replace, delete?
> > Rob
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Rob Spearman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > To: Stellarium developers public mailing list
> > < email@example.com >
> > Subject: Unselecting selected objects
> > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:45:39 -0800
> > I'm working on getting the scripting command to
> > constellations
> > individually again.
> > One option that seems to be the simplest is to add a
> > parameter
> > to StelObjectMgr::setSelectedObject methods. If
> > parameter is true,
> > the objects should be erased by each module from
> their current
> > selection
> > list (rather than added) when
> selectedObjectChangeCallBack is
> > called.
> > Does that sound OK?
> > Rob
> > --
> > Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. tel
> > P.O. Box 2976 fax
> > Bremerton, WA 98310
> > http://digitaliseducation.com
> Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. tel 360.616.8915
> P.O. Box 2976 fax 360.616.8917
> Bremerton, WA 98310
>Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. tel 360.616.8915
P.O. Box 2976 fax 360.616.8917
Bremerton, WA 98310 http://digitaliseducation.com