|
From: Wesley W. T. <we...@te...> - 2003-04-10 11:48:07
|
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:19:13PM +0200, Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > The first time I read about state threads, what I found very interesting, and > surely to many people, is the probable high performance at some internet > servers, which surely doesn't have any type of graphical interface : web > servers, smtp servers, proxies, ... Of course; I think this is what most of us use libst for: fast internet applications. Also, it is a safer way to get threading than using libpthread for internet applications in the end-user domain. For example, my current project uses it for a p2p network. > I'm afraid of including graphical libraries such as glib, and lack the > interest of state threads library to high performance servers. I think I've lost what you meant here? Could you clarify? Are you saying libst is not right for you because you don't write scalable internet servers, and find integrating it with glib too hard? Certainly libst is not right for all projects. > But maybe I'm wrong. > > My two cents. Maybe you're wrong, but maybe you're right, so what did you say? :-) --- Wes |