Re: [ST-users] Multiple asynchronous operations

[Yang Z. <yan...@gm...>]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Michael Abbott <ya...@ya...> wrote:
>> What would be the easiest way to be able to wait on multiple
>> asynchronous operations without having to create a thread per
>> operation?
>
> st_poll()

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that only applies to I/O, as opposed to
asynchronous operations in general, such as mutex locking, sleeping
(though I know there's a timeout parameter already for this), or any
other user-defined asynchronous operation.
-- 
Yang Zhang
http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/