statcvs-users

[Statcvs-users] StatCVS Mailing list reorganization?

[Richard C. <ri...@cy...>]

Hi everybody,

StatCVS currently has three mailing lists:

	statcvs-announce (4 messages, 14 subscribers)
		StatCvs Announcement Mailing List

	statcvs-devel (123 messages, 23 subscribers)
		Discussion of StatCvs development

	statcvs-users (133 messages, 43 subscribers)
		StatCvs Users Mailing List

I want to close down two of the lists. Having everything spread over 
three lists means that discussions are fragmented, people don't know 
where to post, and some people have to subscribe to multiple lists. 
StatCVS is a small project; one mailing list should be sufficient.

I'm not sure which list to keep. Maybe statcvs-users simply because it 
has most subscribers.

What do you, as the affected subscribers to those lists, think? Any 
objections or better ideas?

Richard

RE: [Statcvs-users] StatCVS Mailing list reorganization?

[Vikram S. <vsh...@un...>]

Guess keeping the user list would be the best idea.

-----Original Message-----
From: sta...@li...
[mailto:sta...@li...] On Behalf Of Richard
Cyganiak
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:45 PM
To: sta...@li...; sta...@li...
Subject: [Statcvs-users] StatCVS Mailing list reorganization?

Hi everybody,

StatCVS currently has three mailing lists:

	statcvs-announce (4 messages, 14 subscribers)
		StatCvs Announcement Mailing List

	statcvs-devel (123 messages, 23 subscribers)
		Discussion of StatCvs development

	statcvs-users (133 messages, 43 subscribers)
		StatCvs Users Mailing List

I want to close down two of the lists. Having everything spread over three
lists means that discussions are fragmented, people don't know where to
post, and some people have to subscribe to multiple lists. 
StatCVS is a small project; one mailing list should be sufficient.

I'm not sure which list to keep. Maybe statcvs-users simply because it has
most subscribers.

What do you, as the affected subscribers to those lists, think? Any
objections or better ideas?

Richard



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use
IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your
Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Statcvs-users mailing list
Sta...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/statcvs-users

Re: [Statcvs-users] StatCVS Mailing list reorganization?

[Ian J. <ia...@je...>]

Vikram Sharma wrote:

> Guess keeping the user list would be the best idea.

"Me too"

</aol>


I.

Re: [Statcvs-users] StatCVS Mailing list reorganization?

[Anja J. <an...@an...>]

From: "Vikram Sharma" <vsh...@un...>

> Guess keeping the user list would be the best idea.

Since the list name seems to be the most appropriate (and most users seem to
tend to subscribe to this one), I also think we should keep this one.

Anja

Re: [Statcvs-devel] Re: [Statcvs-users] StatCVS Mailing list reorganization?

[Tammo v. L. <tva...@ta...>]

Anja Jentzsch wrote:

>>Guess keeping the user list would be the best idea.
> 
> Since the list name seems to be the most appropriate (and most users seem to
> tend to subscribe to this one), I also think we should keep this one.

me too.

Tammo

[Statcvs-users] Re: [Statcvs-devel] StatCVS Mailing list reorganization?

[Jukka U. <juk...@dn...>]

Hi,

+ for one mailing list. It does not matter which list remains but user 
list is good choice.

- Jukka -

Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> StatCVS currently has three mailing lists:
>
>     statcvs-announce (4 messages, 14 subscribers)
>         StatCvs Announcement Mailing List
>
>     statcvs-devel (123 messages, 23 subscribers)
>         Discussion of StatCvs development
>
>     statcvs-users (133 messages, 43 subscribers)
>         StatCvs Users Mailing List
>
> I want to close down two of the lists. Having everything spread over 
> three lists means that discussions are fragmented, people don't know 
> where to post, and some people have to subscribe to multiple lists. 
> StatCVS is a small project; one mailing list should be sufficient.
>
> I'm not sure which list to keep. Maybe statcvs-users simply because it 
> has most subscribers.
>
> What do you, as the affected subscribers to those lists, think? Any 
> objections or better ideas?
>
>