From: Richard C. <ri...@cy...> - 2004-10-16 12:13:36
|
Hi Simon, Am 15.10.2004 um 23:55 schrieb Simon Josefsson: > A feature request: make it possible to "embed" the HTML output. One > solution that I believe would be sufficient for me would be to have > two new parameters -tophtml and -bottomhtml, that specified two files. > The contents of those files would be added to the top and bottom, > respectively, of each generated HTML file. The generated output would > have to remove the <html>, <head> and initial <body> stuff, also. I'm a bit opposed to this. Sounds useful, but when we add this, there will soon be requests for customizable <title>, different headers for different types of report pages. I believe that if we want customizable output, then it should be *really* customizable, not just a minimal solution that will not be sufficient in many cases. I'd like to understand why stand-alone reports are not good enough. What are the requirements for the customized reports? Integration with corporate design? Integration in site navigation? Additional information/explanations on every page? That's a question to everyone who wishes for better customizability (it's not the first time the subject comes up). > I noticed StatCVS-XML, but I didn't understand how they embedded their > pages, nor what the difference compared to StatCVS was. But at least > StatCVS-XML used a lot more memory. :-) StatCvs-XML generates XML output and uses XSLT stylesheets to generate either HTML or Maven doc files. That's a very flexible approach. I don't know how much effort it would be to adapt their XSLT stylesheets for your needs, but this would be a way to achieve your goals. Best, Richard |