From: Richard C. <ri...@cy...> - 2004-10-13 22:15:57
|
Hi Simon, thanks for the report! > Hello. I wanted to try statcvs, but it complained: > > jas@latte:~/.daily$ java -jar ~/statcvs-0.2.1/statcvs.jar > libidn.cvs.log libidn StatCVS - CVS statistics generation > > Logfile parsing failed. > unexpected date format in line 52 > jas@latte:~/.daily$ > > Where line 52 is: > > date: 2004-01-22 16:36:30 +0000; author: jas; state: Exp; lines: +1 > -1 > > The date format changed recently in the CVS provided by Debian. This is strange. We know of the changed date format, and support it. I just tried to run StatCVS 0.2.2 (just released, because 0.2.1 had a serious problem) on a log looking like this: date: 2004-06-27 15:21:17 +0000; author: barnicke; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 And this worked for me. The date format is exactly the same as yours. Are you 100% sure that you used StatCVS 0.2.1 and not something older? (Yes, I know you are. Apologies.) Maybe it's some locale thing? Can you send me a copy of the log, or at least a snippet? Thanks, Richard |