I'm actually quite surprised that no one has brought this up yet - which is
indicative of one or more of the following:
I didn't use the correct search terms
I didn't search long enough
The total number of people using this tool is not high enough to motivate an
individual inclined to complain about the situation I'm searching for
The majority of users are Linux-based and the scenario I'm experiencing only
happens for Windows users...
None of the above (added just so I couldn't possibly be wrong! Ha.
I find it very cute that developer names are used as defaults for Class,
Interface, etc... I also find it highly unprofessional. Go ahead and respond
with "How much did you have to pay for this?" "Write your own UML tool and you
can name the entities however you want." blah. blah. blah. Doesn't change the
fact that this is unprofessional. The only way I can see this as a "good"
choice on the part of the devs is if it's a configurable aspect of the tool.
Is that the case here?
Thanks for taking the time to mull over this gripe. Other than that, I find
this to be a rather top-notch tool. I've been an Enterprise Architect user for
many years now, but something convinced me to install this. Hopefully I'll be
able to find some time to investigate some more...
Regards ~ Jason
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I'm actually quite surprised that no one has brought this up yet - which is
indicative of one or more of the following:
I didn't use the correct search terms
I didn't search long enough
The total number of people using this tool is not high enough to motivate an
individual inclined to complain about the situation I'm searching for
The majority of users are Linux-based and the scenario I'm experiencing only
happens for Windows users...
None of the above (added just so I couldn't possibly be wrong! Ha.
I find it very cute that developer names are used as defaults for Class,
Interface, etc... I also find it highly unprofessional. Go ahead and respond
with "How much did you have to pay for this?" "Write your own UML tool and you
can name the entities however you want." blah. blah. blah. Doesn't change the
fact that this is unprofessional. The only way I can see this as a "good"
choice on the part of the devs is if it's a configurable aspect of the tool.
Is that the case here?
Thanks for taking the time to mull over this gripe. Other than that, I find
this to be a rather top-notch tool. I've been an Enterprise Architect user for
many years now, but something convinced me to install this. Hopefully I'll be
able to find some time to investigate some more...
Regards ~ Jason
You may modify or even delete file Contributors.xml.