Thread: RE: [SSI-users] White paper comparing OpenSSI and OpenMosix
Brought to you by:
brucewalker,
rogertsang
From: Roger T. <pe...@ho...> - 2004-10-30 02:39:12
|
>For those of you who might have more recent information on OpenMosix than I >do, >feel free to correct me privately or publicly. > > > A Comparison of OpenSSI and OpenMosix > > Bruce J. Walker > > Oct. 27, 2004 > > > While OpenMosix and OpenSSI have commonality (process-level load >balancing We might also want to compare performance of openMosix versus openSSI. For example performance of MFS/DFSA vs. CFS, process migration, network load of openMosix vs. openSSI interconnect, comparison of system loads for same HPC tasks, and security. _________________________________________________________________ Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx |
From: Kilian C. <kil...@st...> - 2004-11-02 09:51:03
|
On Saturday 30 October 2004 04:38, Roger Tsang wrote: > We might also want to compare performance of openMosix versus > openSSI. For example performance of MFS/DFSA vs. CFS, process migration, > network load of openMosix vs. openSSI interconnect, comparison of system > loads for same HPC tasks, and security. =46or that, I think that a monitoring interface such as openSSI webView cou= ld=20 give useful informations, in terms of network occupation, load average and= =20 so on.=20 Eg., monitoring my 9 nodes cluster for a while shows that the loadaverage o= n=20 each node was never under 1. It's perhaps due to the way I get it (from the= =20 uptime command), which is not accurate. =2D-=20 Kilian CAVALOTTI Ing=E9nieur Syst=E8mes & R= =E9seaux Laboratoire STIX =C9cole Polytechniq= ue =4691128 Palaiseau Tel : +33 1 69 33 41 = 13 |