Thread: [SSI-users] openssi amavis problems
Brought to you by:
brucewalker,
rogertsang
|
From: Karsten N. <ka...@ww...> - 2008-06-23 11:41:30
|
Hi, I am trying to install amavisd-new on openssi 1.9.4 installed from http://www.atlantech.com/~john/openssi-etch I have installed amavisd-new with out problems and added the binary to /cluster/etc/loadlevel amavisd-new seems to die when scanning files extracted to /var/lib/amavis/tmp/xxx/part/xxx and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a very long time before the files gets removed. has anyone any suggestions ? thanks in advance Regards - karsten |
|
From: John H. <jo...@Ca...> - 2008-06-24 08:40:07
|
Karsten Nielsen wrote: > I am trying to install amavisd-new on openssi 1.9.4 installed from > http://www.atlantech.com/~john/openssi-etch > > I have installed amavisd-new with out problems and added the binary > to /cluster/etc/loadlevel > > amavisd-new seems to die when scanning files extracted > to /var/lib/amavis/tmp/xxx/part/xxx > "seems to die"? > and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a very long > time before the files gets removed. > It looks like I've got a bug somewhere in the cfs code. When you remove the files what state is the rm in? (as shown by "ps -l"). |
|
From: Karsten N. <ka...@ww...> - 2008-06-24 09:24:55
|
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 10:39:41 John Hughes wrote: > Karsten Nielsen wrote: > > I am trying to install amavisd-new on openssi 1.9.4 installed from > > http://www.atlantech.com/~john/openssi-etch > > > > I have installed amavisd-new with out problems and added the binary > > to /cluster/etc/loadlevel > > > > amavisd-new seems to die when scanning files extracted > > to /var/lib/amavis/tmp/xxx/part/xxx > > "seems to die"? The amavisd-new process gets an in recoverable error and the process is killed by the master process. It is only the processes that has been migrated to an other node that has this problem. > > > and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a very > > long time before the files gets removed. > > It looks like I've got a bug somewhere in the cfs code. > > When you remove the files what state is the rm in? > > (as shown by "ps -l"). The state of the rm is D. And is the same problem as described as above. When I shutdown the nodes that has been running amavisd-new the rm goes fine with no delay at all. |
|
From: Karsten N. <ka...@ww...> - 2008-06-24 11:14:56
|
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 11:24:46 Karsten Nielsen wrote: > On Tuesday 24 June 2008 10:39:41 John Hughes wrote: > > Karsten Nielsen wrote: > > > I am trying to install amavisd-new on openssi 1.9.4 installed from > > > http://www.atlantech.com/~john/openssi-etch > > > > > > I have installed amavisd-new with out problems and added the binary > > > to /cluster/etc/loadlevel > > > > > > amavisd-new seems to die when scanning files extracted > > > to /var/lib/amavis/tmp/xxx/part/xxx > > > > "seems to die"? > > The amavisd-new process gets an in recoverable error and the process is > killed by the master process. It is only the processes that has been > migrated to an other node that has this problem. > > > > and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a > > > very long time before the files gets removed. > > > > It looks like I've got a bug somewhere in the cfs code. > > > > When you remove the files what state is the rm in? > > > > (as shown by "ps -l"). > > The state of the rm is D. And is the same problem as described as above. > When I shutdown the nodes that has been running amavisd-new the rm goes > fine with no delay at all. If it is to any help ps -l reports WCHAN to be svrcfs on the dead rm process. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Ssic-linux-users mailing list > Ssi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users |
|
From: John H. <jo...@Ca...> - 2008-06-24 11:46:21
|
Karsten Nielsen wrote: > If it is to any help ps -l reports WCHAN to be svrcfs on the dead rm process. > > Yup. Looks like the cfs code is forgetting to do something. Maybe I dropped some code on the floor when I ported the OpenSSI patches to 2.6.12, or maybe 2.6.12 needs something extra. I'll need to think about ways to find out what's going on. |
|
From: John H. <jo...@Ca...> - 2008-06-24 16:03:19
|
John Hughes wrote: > Karsten Nielsen wrote: > >> If it is to any help ps -l reports WCHAN to be svrcfs on the dead rm process. >> >> > Yup. Looks like the cfs code is forgetting to do something. > > Maybe I dropped some code on the floor when I ported the OpenSSI patches > to 2.6.12, or maybe 2.6.12 needs something extra. > I'd guess that if you look at /proc/XXX/wchan you'll find it's in svrcfstok_remove_notify. |
|
From: Karsten N. <ka...@ww...> - 2008-07-01 06:16:42
|
On Monday 30 June 2008 14:04:20 John Hughes wrote: > Karsten Nielsen wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 June 2008 11:24:46 Karsten Nielsen wrote: > >> On Tuesday 24 June 2008 10:39:41 John Hughes wrote: > >>>> and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a > >>>> very long time before the files gets removed. > >>> > >>> It looks like I've got a bug somewhere in the cfs code. > >>> > >>> When you remove the files what state is the rm in? > >>> > >>> (as shown by "ps -l"). > >> > >> The state of the rm is D. And is the same problem as described as above. > >> When I shutdown the nodes that has been running amavisd-new the rm goes > >> fine with no delay at all. > > > > If it is to any help ps -l reports WCHAN to be svrcfs on the dead rm > > process. > > Roger Tsang has sent me a patch that may fix this problem. > > Could you please try it, do: > > apt-get update > apt-get dist-upgrade > > and reboot. The problem is still the same. The rm process has D+ state and the /proc/xxx/wchan reports svrcfstok_remove_notify on that process. |
|
From: John H. <jo...@Ca...> - 2008-06-30 12:04:31
|
Karsten Nielsen wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 June 2008 11:24:46 Karsten Nielsen wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 24 June 2008 10:39:41 John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>>> and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a
>>>> very long time before the files gets removed.
>>>>
>>> It looks like I've got a bug somewhere in the cfs code.
>>>
>>> When you remove the files what state is the rm in?
>>>
>>> (as shown by "ps -l").
>>>
>> The state of the rm is D. And is the same problem as described as above.
>> When I shutdown the nodes that has been running amavisd-new the rm goes
>> fine with no delay at all.
>>
>
> If it is to any help ps -l reports WCHAN to be svrcfs on the dead rm process.
>
Roger Tsang has sent me a patch that may fix this problem.
Could you please try it, do:
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
and reboot.
|
|
From: John H. <jo...@Ca...> - 2008-07-01 10:27:33
|
Karsten Nielsen wrote: > On Monday 30 June 2008 14:04:20 John Hughes wrote: > >> Roger Tsang has sent me a patch that may fix this problem. >> >> Could you please try it, do: >> >> apt-get update >> apt-get dist-upgrade >> >> and reboot. >> > > The problem is still the same. The rm process has D+ state and > the /proc/xxx/wchan reports svrcfstok_remove_notify on that process. > Drat. Just in case, do: # uname -r -v should be: 2.6.12-ssi-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 19:20:41 UTC 2008 # dpkg -l linux-image-2.6.12-ssi-686-smp should be Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==============-==============-============================================ ii linux-image-2. 1.9.4-3 Linux kernel binary image for version 2.6.12 |
|
From: Karsten N. <ka...@ww...> - 2008-07-01 10:32:52
|
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 12:27:44 John Hughes wrote: > Karsten Nielsen wrote: > > On Monday 30 June 2008 14:04:20 John Hughes wrote: > >> Roger Tsang has sent me a patch that may fix this problem. > >> > >> Could you please try it, do: > >> > >> apt-get update > >> apt-get dist-upgrade > >> > >> and reboot. > > > > The problem is still the same. The rm process has D+ state and > > the /proc/xxx/wchan reports svrcfstok_remove_notify on that process. > > Drat. > > Just in case, do: > > # uname -r -v > > should be: > > 2.6.12-ssi-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 19:20:41 UTC 2008 > > # dpkg -l linux-image-2.6.12-ssi-686-smp > > should be > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > | uppercase=bad) > | > ||/ Name Version Description > > +++-==============-==============-========================================= >=== ii linux-image-2. 1.9.4-3 Linux kernel binary image for version > 2.6.12 Here is my output and is the same as you posted master01:~# uname -r -v 2.6.12-ssi-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 19:20:41 UTC 2008 master01:~# dpkg -l linux-image-2.6.12-ssi-686-smp Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=======================================-=======================================-============================================================================================== ii linux-image-2.6.12-ssi-686-smp 1.9.4-3 Linux kernel binary image for version 2.6.12-ssi-686-smp |
|
From: John H. <jo...@Ca...> - 2008-11-05 14:57:18
|
Karsten Nielsen wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to install amavisd-new on openssi 1.9.4 installed from > http://www.atlantech.com/~john/openssi-etch > > I have installed amavisd-new with out problems and added the binary > to /cluster/etc/loadlevel > > amavisd-new seems to die when scanning files extracted > to /var/lib/amavis/tmp/xxx/part/xxx > > and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a very long > time before the files gets removed. > Any chance you could re-try this with the packages currently on http://deb.openssi.org/alpha/openssi-etch? There is a new kernel that's working better for me. |
|
From: Walker, B. J (HP-Labs) <bru...@hp...> - 2008-11-05 17:39:44
|
In case you haven't already tried: 1. try it without loadlevel; 2. try running it on a node other than the node where the files are stored; Are the files in question open by the application when you are trying to remove them? Bruce -----Original Message----- From: John Hughes [mailto:jo...@Ca...] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:57 AM To: Karsten Nielsen Cc: ssi...@li... Subject: Re: [SSI-users] openssi amavis problems Karsten Nielsen wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to install amavisd-new on openssi 1.9.4 installed from > http://www.atlantech.com/~john/openssi-etch > > I have installed amavisd-new with out problems and added the binary to > /cluster/etc/loadlevel > > amavisd-new seems to die when scanning files extracted to > /var/lib/amavis/tmp/xxx/part/xxx > > and when I try to manually remove these files the system hangs for a > very long time before the files gets removed. > Any chance you could re-try this with the packages currently on http://deb.openssi.org/alpha/openssi-etch? There is a new kernel that's working better for me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ssic-linux-users mailing list Ssi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users |