Re: [SSI-users] Sourceforge Bug tracking

[David B Z. <dav...@hp...>]

I don't see any special error handling in base Redhat.  Basically, 
there is already a S99local in /etc/rc.d/rc{2,3,4,5}.d directories.  
However, they are symbolic linked to ../rc.local instead of 
../init.d/local.  Because this file isn't in /etc/rc.d/init.d 
(/etc/init.d) chkconfig can't be used to manipulate it.

In Redhat too bad the chkconfig command doesn't do a special 
checking/message if an attempt is made  to create a service "local."

David

On Mar 26, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Brian J. Watson wrote:

> David B Zafman wrote:
>> It is a base Linux issue (at least in Redhat): you can't have a 
>> service called "local" because of the special /etc/rc.local script.
>
> Does the code give an informative warning that "local" is not allowed?
>
> Brian
>
>