You can subscribe to this list here.
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2019 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Ernesto N. C. A. <ec...@gm...> - 2007-06-10 00:31:50
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello. I need follow information for Debian policy. sshguard author and Copyright. debian/copyright: - ------------------------------------ Upstream Author(s): sshguard maintainers <ssh...@li...> Copyright: Copyright (C) sshguard Team - ---------------------------- I only need that information for debian package. Ernesto Crespo - -- Ernesto Crespo Linux Registered User: #418790 GNU/Linux Debian Etch- Kernel 2.6.20.6 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fingerprint = 66CB 6BF4 7C7C EC0E DA60 06C8 87E8 9061 C97E 7015 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGa0akh+iQYcl+cBURAuBcAJoCP5xU1RTxAwKO1DlRKlmBHSlfUwCfSDyz dhsiKLcmq0TcFlGRMyS4jUQ= =AC5V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: mantra U. <uni...@gm...> - 2007-06-08 04:56:30
|
Hello Mij, I believe i have included what you are looking for; - Licence Type is changed to "BSD" - Package Group is set to be "Applications/System" - Added "--with-firewall=iptables" - Check for path to the "iptables", if not found in "/sbin/iptables" then defaults to "/usr/sbin/iptables" - The yum URL is http://tantra.homelinux.net/yum/ .../yum/sshguard/i386/ has the binary RPM .../yum/sshguard/source/ has the source Regards, mantra - Instrument of Thought On 6/6/07, Mij <mi...@bi...> wrote: > > thank you > > Two more things: > 1) what command do people use to this rpm? "yum $URL"? > 2) had a quick look at the spec file in src.spm: > # the license is BSD if it has any impact > # if there is any more appropriate group than "Applications/ > Productivity"? > I believe something with "security" or "system" in it would be good > # if iptables is not in /sbin/iptables: does the build work for > unprivileged users too? if not, I recommend appending > --with-iptables=/usr/sbin/iptables > to ./configure > > If you agree with these mods, please send me the final > version; I will publish the bin rpm, the src rpm and the txt with the > commands for using them > > thanks > > > On 06/giu/07, at 07:15, mantra UNIX wrote: > > > mij, > > > > Attached are the Source and Binary RPM's built and tested for > > 'Fedora Core 6', i386 Architecture. I can provide a web-link for > > package downloads. Let me know. > > > > Nice job on version 1.0. > > > > Regards, > > Tantra > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Sshguard-maintainers mailing list > Ssh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sshguard-maintainers > -- Regards, mantra - Instrument of Thought |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-06-06 08:57:22
|
thank you Two more things: 1) what command do people use to this rpm? "yum $URL"? 2) had a quick look at the spec file in src.spm: # the license is BSD if it has any impact # if there is any more appropriate group than "Applications/ Productivity"? I believe something with "security" or "system" in it would be good # if iptables is not in /sbin/iptables: does the build work for unprivileged users too? if not, I recommend appending --with-iptables=/usr/sbin/iptables to ./configure If you agree with these mods, please send me the final version; I will publish the bin rpm, the src rpm and the txt with the commands for using them thanks On 06/giu/07, at 07:15, mantra UNIX wrote: > mij, > > Attached are the Source and Binary RPM's built and tested for > 'Fedora Core 6', i386 Architecture. I can provide a web-link for > package downloads. Let me know. > > Nice job on version 1.0. > > Regards, > Tantra |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-06-05 14:44:37
|
hello folks, sshguard 1.0 stable has been finally released, see http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=701923 There is a couple of relevant news for maintainers wrt 0.91: 1) paths can now be set during ./configure For example, iptables path, or the path of /etc/hosts.allow file. These are autodetected via $PATH if they're not specified manually. If the package compiles on the user host, mind that some systems exclude sbin from users PATH, so specifing the path manually is safer. 2) there is now a man page to install (man/sshguard.8) It is installed automatically during make install 3) there is an example file for whitelisting in exmples/ whitelistfile.example. Depending on the policy of the system, decide whether (and where) to copy this example file into the system. 4) a thorough setup guide covering all the setup combos is available at http://sshguard.sourceforge.net/doc/setup/setup.html Unless your package makes the software "up and running" (which is preferred, when possible), I recommend to show it off as feedback after a successful installation. I remind to use the syslog+sshguard or syslog-ng+sshguard whenever possible; avoid the tail+sshguard combo which is just a working hack. Last but not least, there is a new "policy" for maintainerships: - I have freed slots on http://sshguard.sourceforge.net/doc/ sshguardpackages.html for sshguard 1.0 - if you intend to build a package for an OS, please send a message to the sshguard-maintainers ml containing: - the target OS or OSes - the URL of the package, or the package content itself if you want mirroring - possibly a brief TXT or HTML file with notes for users to install the package if it's not trivial on default setups (for example on unofficial APT sources, or gentoo sunrise etc). If what you need to say is already explained somewhere else, feel free to redirect there. I will publish your file on the website for better user feedback. Your help is appreciated, thanks |
From: mantra U. <uni...@gm...> - 2007-05-26 04:38:01
|
sure. On 5/25/07, Mij <mi...@bi...> wrote: > > > On 25/mag/07, at 22:59, mantra UNIX wrote: > > > Hi there, > > Is there a 'sshgaurd' RPM for 'Fedora Core' ? If not i would like > > to create one. > > there is not a fedora package so far. > A fedora rpm is definitely appealing, but I would suggest to wait for > 1.0 final to be > released. > This should happen within a month, as beta3 is essentially a release > candidate. > > thank you > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Sshguard-maintainers mailing list > Ssh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sshguard-maintainers > |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-05-25 23:36:10
|
On 25/mag/07, at 22:59, mantra UNIX wrote: > Hi there, > Is there a 'sshgaurd' RPM for 'Fedora Core' ? If not i would like > to create one. there is not a fedora package so far. A fedora rpm is definitely appealing, but I would suggest to wait for 1.0 final to be released. This should happen within a month, as beta3 is essentially a release candidate. thank you |
From: mantra U. <uni...@gm...> - 2007-05-25 20:59:21
|
Hi there, Is there a 'sshgaurd' RPM for 'Fedora Core' ? If not i would like to create one. - Tantra |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-04-26 16:35:12
|
On 17/apr/07, at 01:34, Nathan Paquin wrote: > Has anyone volunteered to maintain an RPM for Redhat/Centos? my mua just marked this message as spam... not yet, I would appreciate one. Mind that RedHat has iptables in / usr/sbin, not /sbin AFAIK > Regards, > > Nathan |
From: Nathan P. <np...@cc...> - 2007-04-16 23:34:33
|
Has anyone volunteered to maintain an RPM for Redhat/Centos? Regards, Nathan |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-03-17 10:43:34
|
sshguard v. 1.0 is coming in some weeks, with a couple of relevant changes that maintainers should be aware of: 1) attack recognition is no longer done by mean of regular expressions, but with a yacc/bison grammar specification. Effects: - sensible improvement in power of recognition (from regular languages to context-free ones) - can recognize hostnames ("UseDNS no" sshd setting recommendation now superseded) - can recognize IPv6 addresses - any customization made to the regexp recognizing attacks on your system is lost (I recommend reporting any unrecognized attack pattern to me for inclusion in the original source. You can do it directly or via http://sshguard.sourceforge.net/newattackpatt.php ) 2) the path of iptables can be set with ./configure --with-iptables=/path.../iptables |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-03-17 10:42:12
|
Some up to date recommendations when packaging sshguard: - always use sshguard v. 0.91 - when a URL to the project is to be included, use http://sshguard.sourceforge.net - make sshguard run in syslog / syslog-ng whenever possible - if you run sshguard standalone, use "tail -n -F src_logfile" (not -f as pointed in README), and determine the correct src_logfile that gets ssh entries in the target system - if you run sshguard with syslog-ng, mind to use the following filter: filter sshlogs { facility(auth, authpriv) and match("ssh"); }; (add "auth, " to the filter reported in README) - LINUX: sshguard wants iptables in /sbin/ by default. If the target system has iptables somewhere else, mind to adjust paths in file fwalls/command_iptables.h before configuring |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-03-17 00:17:34
|
Thank you Ali I will mark "work in progress" the gentoo package and the debian package from Ernesto (of which I lost the announcement mail for some reason), and associate you as maintainers. Please notify when the packages are commited upstream (I will mark them done then). On 2007-03-15 22:58:24 +0100 Ali Polatel <po...@ne...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > I've written an ebuild for portage, it has a maintainer-wanted bug > right now ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 ) and the > ebuild is in the official Gentoo Sunrise overlay. > (http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svn/reviewed/net-misc/sshguard/ ) > > You can put a notice on the webpage saying the gentoo users can get it > through the sunrise overlay by : > > -> First add sunrise to overlays using layman: > layman -A sunrise > -> Then emerge sshguard > emerge sshguard > > The package has to be maintained by a gentoo developer to get into the > official portage tree and hopefully that'll happen soon. > > Ali > > * Mij (mi...@bi...) wrote: >> dear maintainers, >> >> some of you wrote me in in the past days for notifying they are >> creating a >> package for sshguard. >> >> I would like to summarize here who is doing what and for which >> platform. >> >> For example, I am most interested in a debian or ubuntu package, and >> a >> gentoo portage. >> Anyone is taking these? >> >> bye >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sshguard-maintainers mailing list >> Ssh...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sshguard-maintainers >> > > - -- Ali Polatel (hawking) <po...@ne...> > http://hawking.nonlogic.org/ > gpg: F0186CA2 fp: 7110 01E2 F8B6 83A2 AC52 1D9F 986B 76E1 F018 6CA2 > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail > /\ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFF+cGAmGt24fAYbKIRAjMAAKCGH0RW/EiEd8PF5uzwbBnTp0KjwQCeLikT > nFMoIdkwTOyrnVUizIVx2x4= > =yoad > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Sshguard-maintainers mailing list > Ssh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sshguard-maintainers > |
From: Ali P. <po...@ne...> - 2007-03-16 09:42:46
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've written an ebuild for portage, it has a maintainer-wanted bug right now ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 ) and the ebuild is in the official Gentoo Sunrise overlay. (http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svn/reviewed/net-misc/sshguard/ ) You can put a notice on the webpage saying the gentoo users can get it through the sunrise overlay by : -> First add sunrise to overlays using layman: layman -A sunrise -> Then emerge sshguard emerge sshguard The package has to be maintained by a gentoo developer to get into the official portage tree and hopefully that'll happen soon. Ali * Mij (mi...@bi...) wrote: > dear maintainers, > > some of you wrote me in in the past days for notifying they are creating a > package for sshguard. > > I would like to summarize here who is doing what and for which platform. > > For example, I am most interested in a debian or ubuntu package, and a > gentoo portage. > Anyone is taking these? > > bye > > _______________________________________________ > Sshguard-maintainers mailing list > Ssh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sshguard-maintainers > - -- Ali Polatel (hawking) <po...@ne...> http://hawking.nonlogic.org/ gpg: F0186CA2 fp: 7110 01E2 F8B6 83A2 AC52 1D9F 986B 76E1 F018 6CA2 () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF+cGAmGt24fAYbKIRAjMAAKCGH0RW/EiEd8PF5uzwbBnTp0KjwQCeLikT nFMoIdkwTOyrnVUizIVx2x4= =yoad -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-03-15 01:27:29
|
dear maintainers, Jérôme Lemaire sent me this startup script for sshguard. I did not review this contribution. While my recommendation is definitely to have sshguard run by syslog, I hope it can be useful for those of you who decide to make sshguard run standalone. |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-03-15 01:22:17
|
dear maintainers, First of all, I would recommend anyone to use v. 0.91 for packaging, not 0.9. I am aware v. 0.9 has been "default download" up to recently; I just forgot to update the download page which is not automatic w/ new releases. Besides this, I am aware of an article at linux.com about sshguard http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/02/27/1957242 this also suggest to use v. 0.9 whereas 0.91 was already available at the time of writing. But there is another, major mistake in this article, because it suggests to make sshguard setuid. Besides the deep pointlessness of this, it opens a serious security threat, as any user can craft a couple of plaintext lines and give them to sshguard to block any IP address it likes. |
From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2007-03-15 01:12:09
|
dear maintainers, some of you wrote me in in the past days for notifying they are creating a package for sshguard. I would like to summarize here who is doing what and for which platform. For example, I am most interested in a debian or ubuntu package, and a gentoo portage. Anyone is taking these? bye |
From: Ali P. <po...@ne...> - 2007-03-12 21:25:20
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, I want to help sshguard development. I wrote an ebuild for sshguard, it's now in the Gentoo sunrise overlay ( and its maintainer-needed bug is https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 ) and I plan to maintain it. I also want to help with the code. Regards, Ali - -- Ali Polatel (hawking) <po...@ne...> http://hawking.nonlogic.org/ gpg: F0186CA2 fp: 7110 01E2 F8B6 83A2 AC52 1D9F 986B 76E1 F018 6CA2 () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF9cVPmGt24fAYbKIRAhD9AKDdKSaDKQUALNTJbZOx0BUzgD7f/wCgyE13 mbos9ybsZEu5qpp2zn6VsTU= =fNIU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Ernesto N. C. A. <ec...@gm...> - 2007-03-12 03:07:26
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi. My Name is Ernesto Crespo. I'am Debian Maintainer. http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ec...@de... I can build debian package. I can send Intend To Package for WNPP. Ernesto Crespo - -- Ernesto Crespo Linux Registered User: #418790 GNU/Linux Debian Etch- Kernel 2.6.18 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fingerprint = 66CB 6BF4 7C7C EC0E DA60 06C8 87E8 9061 C97E 7015 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF9M4Vh+iQYcl+cBURAsx7AJwNtQVKKIn/Rd/LyKQj26GOi94FUgCeJYNa MtVYULdo6UFTjBBXuycLUg0= =ib1Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |