From: Kevin Z. <kev...@gm...> - 2017-01-19 17:27:20
|
On 01/19/17 09:17, William Woodruff wrote: > Speaking for brew, we generally like it when upstreams bundle a > configuration (or tell us what a good default one would look like). It > makes installation simpler and allows us to direct users to the > program's community instead of fielding program-specific support > ourselves. We have a sample configuration in the source distribution (see examples/sshguard.conf.sample). We're not sure how to install it since every OS seems to want it in a different place. The sample configuration has been updated substantially since the preview was released. Check on Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/sshguard/sshguard/src/46d9a3d604900b39d66a046017a84887462d27d2/examples/sshguard.conf.sample?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default > Not a problem. In a way, it was good that we accidentally bumped > to 1.99 - we're now prepared to handle changes in the stable release ;) Hopefully this won't be too bumpy. Best, Kevin -- Kevin Zheng kev...@gm... | ke...@be... | PGP: 0xC22E1090 |