From: Jim S. <jse...@Li...> - 2016-12-03 15:32:57
|
I'm getting the same thing on my Linux hosts. $ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS $ sshguard -v sshguard 1.7.0 Example from /var/log/auth.log: Dec 2 01:35:31 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: blocking for 840 secs (4 attacks in 0 secs, after 1 abuses over 0 secs) Dec 2 01:35:31 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: should already have been blocked Dec 2 01:50:59 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: unblocking after 928 secs Dec 2 02:00:50 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: blocking for 1680 secs (4 attacks in 0 secs, after 2 abuses over 1519 secs) Dec 2 02:00:50 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: should already have been blocked Dec 2 02:28:51 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: unblocking after 1681 secs Dec 2 02:50:39 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: blocking for 3360 secs (4 attacks in 0 secs, after 3 abuses over 4508 secs) Dec 2 02:50:39 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: should already have been blocked Dec 2 03:46:48 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: unblocking after 3369 secs Dec 2 07:56:07 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: blocking for 6720 secs (4 attacks in 0 secs, after 4 abuses over 22836 secs) Dec 2 07:56:07 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: should already have been blocked Dec 2 07:56:07 mail sshguard[1222]: message repeated 2 times: [ 1.55.63.241: should already have been blocked] Dec 2 09:50:03 mail sshguard[1222]: 1.55.63.241: unblocking after 6836 secs That was from yesterday. Here's the current iptables state: $ sudo iptables -L [sudo] password for <elided>: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination sshguard all -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain sshguard (1 references) target prot opt source destination DROP all -- 187-92-160-77.customer.tdatabrasil.net.br anywhere Never used to see this until I replaced the repo version with one I built from a tarball to get proper Postfix parsing. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>. |