|
From: Kevin Z. <kev...@gm...> - 2015-05-27 02:54:18
|
Hi Greg, You should consider checking out the latest sources from the Bitbucket repository. That might be easier to work with than running from ports. On 05/26/2015 21:34, Greg Putrich wrote: > While sshguard was still running, confirmed it did not add the entry. Then I > stopped sshguard. I copy & pasted the command from the log and it went in > without issue. This seems odd. > Copied a blacklist.db file with 213 entries. Upon start, it attempted to > insert, but failed. It made a long command, but was chopped off on the > 67th IP address (that address had its last digit cut off). and there are > still 146 more after that one that never made the list. I'm not entirely certain why it was truncated, either. > The latter command clearly could not be added as it was truncated. However, > unsure why it didn't like the first one. If anything, I think this is an indication that the current `ipfw` backend is unsalvagable and should be replaced with the command framework thing. I'll start taking a closer look at that. It would end up being similar to how `pf` is currently handled: you create a table 'sshguard', then SSHGuard would be responsible for adding and removing addresses from the table. This means that SSHGuard wouldn't have to fiddle with rule numbers. Thoughts? Thanks, Kevin Zheng -- Kevin Zheng kev...@gm... | ke...@kd... | PGP: 0xC22E1090 |