From: Mij <mi...@ss...> - 2010-02-10 11:41:24
|
For the archives, the switch from attack counts to weight/density/dangerousness has been committed in r173 as part of other features, and will make it into version 1.5. This makes it reasonable to implement handling of messages of the kind we discussed in this thread. If someone is still interested, feel free to submit to http://www.sshguard.net/support/attacks/submit/ On Jul 3, 2009, at 17:14 , Mij wrote: > FYI, we've scheduled this for 1.5 and we'll be working on this kind of > soon. > > > On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:49 , Hans F. Nordhaug wrote: > >> Thx for your reply, michele, and sorry about not coming back to this >> issue before now. To me 1 isn't such a big problem - there are many >> ways to work around it. However, 2 is a real problem that I didn't >> think about. I clearly can't use the same "density" for SSH and HTTP. >> I think I'll wait for you ;-) >> >> I definetly think this would be a nice addition to SSHGuard, but I >> also realize that it might not make sense to extend SSHGuard to handle >> every thing. Maybe there are other tools out there that all ready >> do the job? I just happen to like SSHGuard. >> >> Regards, >> Hans > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Sshguard-users mailing list > Ssh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sshguard-users |