From: Mij <mi...@bi...> - 2009-07-03 15:14:19
|
FYI, we've scheduled this for 1.5 and we'll be working on this kind of soon. On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:49 , Hans F. Nordhaug wrote: > Thx for your reply, michele, and sorry about not coming back to this > issue before now. To me 1 isn't such a big problem - there are many > ways to work around it. However, 2 is a real problem that I didn't > think about. I clearly can't use the same "density" for SSH and HTTP. > I think I'll wait for you ;-) > > I definetly think this would be a nice addition to SSHGuard, but I > also realize that it might not make sense to extend SSHGuard to handle > every thing. Maybe there are other tools out there that all ready > do the job? I just happen to like SSHGuard. > > Regards, > Hans |