Re: [Ssh-sftp-perl-users] Change port used in Net::SFTP

[Mark F. <mar...@ea...>]

I don't know what an "RT ticket" is. :) I'm sorry if my bad day came through
in that email. But, if the ssh-args parm isn't going to change anytime soon,
I think the convoluted usage should be exampled. The convoluted thing isn't
too bad if it's just documented with an example. I know I've mentioned it a
couple of times. One of which should be in the archives (which seem to be
unavailable at the moment).

If I need to do something formal, tell me what to do. I know it was this way
before you tookover support. I'm sorry if I came on too strong. It just
needs an example in the POD.

Mark


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Rolsky" <au...@ur...>
To: "Mark Fuller" <mar...@ea...>
Cc: "Vitali Cesare" <CV...@me...>;
<ssh...@li...>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Ssh-sftp-perl-users] Change port used in Net::SFTP


> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Mark Fuller wrote:
>
> > Dave, I asked you *6 months ago* to add an example to the POD. You keep
>
> Wow, was it that long?
>
> > saying it shouldn't work this way. Until it doesn't work this way,
wouldn't
> > it be helpful to document how it works now? It took me *two days* to
figure
> > out how to do the above. It seems other users have the same challenge.
Why
> > not just add it to the POD so we don't have to suffer with it any more?
I
> > don't think it's a problem how convoluted it is. Just that it's not
> > documented -- and apparently no interest in documenting it.
>
> Hey, don't blame me!  It wasn't documented when I got this thing.  But
> yes, it should be documented.  Is there an RT ticket for this?
>
>
> -dave
>
> /*=======================
> House Absolute Consulting
> www.houseabsolute.com
> =======================*/