RE: [srvx-devel] P10 ACCOUNT

[Zoot <zo...@pl...>]

If the account databases of both srvx instances are kept synchronized,
it is perfectly possible to link them to the same network and
authenticate once. Your scheme is unnecessary and requires a much higher
account length limit than should be considered.

# Zoot

> -----Original Message-----
> From: srv...@li... 
> [mailto:srv...@li...] On Behalf Of Byte
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 8:58 AM
> To: srv...@li...
> Subject: [srvx-devel] P10 ACCOUNT
> 
> 
> I think this should support multiple srvx in some way, what 
> does everyone 
> else think?
> 
> i.e. set account to use the form "<srvx id>=<id>;<srvx id>=<id>;"?
> (where "srvx id" could be srvx numeric?)
> 
> Otherwise, it's not possible to be authenticated to both srvx 
> over a split :/
> 
> --
> by...@zl...
> http://byte.zlined.org/
> http://pgp.zlined.org/Byte.asc
> 19-May-2002 16:21:15
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
> 
> iQA/AwUAPOa6jUCsucq83bnYEQK0ggCggDUPkEwQfdVoszNw/YiuSkDVG1QAniOB
> +EoAWEhBXIpuNQuG9fIug2rv
> =T2wY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> srvx-devel mailing list
> srv...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/srvx-devel
>