RE: [srvx-devel] P10 ACCOUNT
Brought to you by:
entrope
From: Zoot <zo...@pl...> - 2002-08-08 21:04:26
|
If the account databases of both srvx instances are kept synchronized, it is perfectly possible to link them to the same network and authenticate once. Your scheme is unnecessary and requires a much higher account length limit than should be considered. # Zoot > -----Original Message----- > From: srv...@li... > [mailto:srv...@li...] On Behalf Of Byte > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 8:58 AM > To: srv...@li... > Subject: [srvx-devel] P10 ACCOUNT > > > I think this should support multiple srvx in some way, what > does everyone > else think? > > i.e. set account to use the form "<srvx id>=<id>;<srvx id>=<id>;"? > (where "srvx id" could be srvx numeric?) > > Otherwise, it's not possible to be authenticated to both srvx > over a split :/ > > -- > by...@zl... > http://byte.zlined.org/ > http://pgp.zlined.org/Byte.asc > 19-May-2002 16:21:15 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8 > > iQA/AwUAPOa6jUCsucq83bnYEQK0ggCggDUPkEwQfdVoszNw/YiuSkDVG1QAniOB > +EoAWEhBXIpuNQuG9fIug2rv > =T2wY > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > srvx-devel mailing list > srv...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/srvx-devel > |