Re: [srvx-devel] getting srvx-1.1 out the door

[R. B. S. <ris...@vt...>]

I hate to throw this in the mix, but we're starting to seriously consider
bahamut now.  Run's reasoning for switching was that we were more production
oriented and he was looking for a more development oriented network.  No
hard feelings there I suppose.  Anyways, what needs to be done to implement
another protocol?

-def

----- Original Message -----
From: "Entrope" <en...@us...>
To: <srv...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: [srvx-devel] getting srvx-1.1 out the door


> I'd like to make a push the next two weeks or so to get srvx 1.1
> finished and start testing the new code.  Most of the "finish it" code
> is HelpServ, although there are a few other minor features that can be
> done (listed below).  Do people (in particular the other developers :)
> have time that they can commit to helping us get to a shipping state?
>
> Minor TODOs:
> - Disallow !(ejectuser) *!*@*
> - Optionally send a message to a new channel's owner after !register
> - Don't fight over /TOPIC (and/or /MODES) if setter is +k.
> - ?trace gline channel -#foo (or +#foo or @#foo), to gline everyone in
>   #foo with neither voice nor ops (or with voice and no ops, or ops,
>   respectively)
> - (maybe) Option to kickban users joining channel who aren't on userlist
> - (maybe) "?collide nick username@host description" instead of "username
host"
> Anything else?
>
> -- Entrope
>
> _______________________________________________
> srvx-devel mailing list
> srv...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/srvx-devel