Re: [SrcML] XHTML-ViewPlugin
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
crashchaos
From: Icaro <ic...@gm...> - 2005-11-19 14:17:34
|
Frank Raiser ha scritto: >As you already pointed out below CSS is a good way too and CSS has two >major advantage over a property file as you described it: > > > Yes, CSS is better! :-) >>PS: is srcML in some way related to this: >>http://www.sdml.info/projects/srcml/ (SDML: srcML) >> >> > >Note that our project goes by the name SrcML (with a capital S). Both >project names simply originate from the obvious name "source code markup >language" with "markup language" generally being abbreviated as ML (as >in XML, HTML and various other lesser-known markup languages). As we >didn't want to choose a name not including that it's about source code >and a markup language we just went for the obvious. > >But other than the basic idea of an XML represenation of source code >there is not much SrcML and srcML have in common. The resulting XML >files are fundamentally different (mostly due to the srcML project >insisting on a 1:1 relation between the source code file and the XML >file, whereas SrcML only cares about the semantics). Also the srcML >project has a C++ parser only while we have a Java parser only (with >both projects being able to support more parser but lacking the >developers to write them ;) The supporting API and Platforms are unique >to SrcML too, as srcML only consists of a parser afaik. > thank you for the clarifications. Icaro -- http://icaro.blogspot.com |