You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(323) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(886) |
Feb
(712) |
Mar
(808) |
Apr
(522) |
May
(798) |
Jun
(462) |
Jul
(718) |
Aug
(765) |
Sep
(680) |
Oct
(610) |
Nov
(763) |
Dec
(805) |
2003 |
Jan
(907) |
Feb
(960) |
Mar
(757) |
Apr
(1072) |
May
(1084) |
Jun
(934) |
Jul
(839) |
Aug
(587) |
Sep
(644) |
Oct
(824) |
Nov
(653) |
Dec
(611) |
2004 |
Jan
(556) |
Feb
(405) |
Mar
(619) |
Apr
(557) |
May
(630) |
Jun
(577) |
Jul
(535) |
Aug
(460) |
Sep
(446) |
Oct
(597) |
Nov
(517) |
Dec
(471) |
2005 |
Jan
(474) |
Feb
(573) |
Mar
(438) |
Apr
(508) |
May
(355) |
Jun
(455) |
Jul
(389) |
Aug
(412) |
Sep
(382) |
Oct
(345) |
Nov
(448) |
Dec
(368) |
2006 |
Jan
(433) |
Feb
(378) |
Mar
(379) |
Apr
(356) |
May
(265) |
Jun
(334) |
Jul
(305) |
Aug
(273) |
Sep
(292) |
Oct
(192) |
Nov
(240) |
Dec
(263) |
2007 |
Jan
(279) |
Feb
(222) |
Mar
(185) |
Apr
(175) |
May
(313) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(157) |
Aug
(236) |
Sep
(277) |
Oct
(274) |
Nov
(198) |
Dec
(285) |
2008 |
Jan
(251) |
Feb
(188) |
Mar
(185) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(203) |
Jun
(152) |
Jul
(198) |
Aug
(135) |
Sep
(178) |
Oct
(160) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(175) |
2009 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(117) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(130) |
Jun
(148) |
Jul
(157) |
Aug
(98) |
Sep
(117) |
Oct
(96) |
Nov
(112) |
Dec
(129) |
2010 |
Jan
(126) |
Feb
(158) |
Mar
(149) |
Apr
(60) |
May
(87) |
Jun
(149) |
Jul
(128) |
Aug
(66) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(62) |
2011 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(68) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(66) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(45) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(51) |
Dec
(45) |
2012 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(72) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(39) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(21) |
2013 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(3) |
2014 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(12) |
2015 |
Jan
(30) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(45) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(8) |
2016 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(15) |
2017 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
2019 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2020 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(13) |
2021 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(21) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(6) |
2022 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(21) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(4) |
2023 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(11) |
2024 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(11) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-05-12 13:21:40
|
On Wed, May 12, 2021 00:04, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > So if your change for some reason helps the problem, that'd be great to > know, but it may not change what we need to do (or have already done) on > our end. > The change I made to the samesite setting did not make a difference. I still get logged out at seemingly random times. Not often but more than once a day. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |
From: Ted H. <te...@io...> - 2021-05-12 06:35:14
|
Paul, Thanks for both dealing with this issue and doing so quite promptly. Cheers, Ted Hatfield On Wed, 12 May 2021, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Ted, > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 12:18 am, Ted Hatfield wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> A question that I was unable to find an answer for. >> >> I had a user ask a question that I was unable to anser. When a message is >> placed into the drafts folder the date field is the date/time when the >> message was started not when it was actually sent. >> >> In his instance he started a message and saved it to his drafts folder, >> then picked up the message a week later when he actually completed and >> sent the message. >> >> The sent message showed the date/time when the message was started not >> when the message was actually sent. >> >> I'm running the squirrelmail package from the FreeBSD ports system. >> >> squirrelmail-php73-20200422 >> >> Can anyone tell me if this is the intended result or if I need to update >> to the newest version of the 1.43 stable branch to resolve the issue. > > This is not exactly intended, but it is the way it is coded -- fair to say > that it's a bug. There was even a note in the code suggesting that this > may be a problem. Suffice to say that is has been fixed and will be > available in the next nightly snapshots on our download page (allow 24 > hours). > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > Cheers, > Paul > -- > Paul Lesniewski > SquirrelMail Team > Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! > http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php > > > > > ----- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines > List address: squ...@li... > List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users > |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-12 05:56:37
|
Ted, On Mon, May 10, 2021 12:18 am, Ted Hatfield wrote: > > Hey all, > > A question that I was unable to find an answer for. > > I had a user ask a question that I was unable to anser. When a message is > placed into the drafts folder the date field is the date/time when the > message was started not when it was actually sent. > > In his instance he started a message and saved it to his drafts folder, > then picked up the message a week later when he actually completed and > sent the message. > > The sent message showed the date/time when the message was started not > when the message was actually sent. > > I'm running the squirrelmail package from the FreeBSD ports system. > > squirrelmail-php73-20200422 > > Can anyone tell me if this is the intended result or if I need to update > to the newest version of the 1.43 stable branch to resolve the issue. This is not exactly intended, but it is the way it is coded -- fair to say that it's a bug. There was even a note in the code suggesting that this may be a problem. Suffice to say that is has been fixed and will be available in the next nightly snapshots on our download page (allow 24 hours). Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-12 05:51:21
|
On Wed, May 12, 2021 4:04 am, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 5:14 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: >> I have stumbled across these which appear to me to be related to the >> issue >> I >> brought to your attention: >> >> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2020/08/changes-to-samesite-cookie-behavior/ >> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617609 > > Thanks, but as I said, you saw an *advisory warning* in the console and it > should not have had anything to do with the problem. But if it is for > some reason causing an issue, there is a change in SVN now that should > eliminate any concerns about SameSite. > >> I have added our SM web address to the >> 'network.cookie.sameSite.laxByDefault.disabledHosts' setting in FF. I >> will >> report if the logouts continue or not following this change. > > The warning seems to be pointing out the opposite, where what you want is > Lax but it is currently using None (and thinks the cookies don't have the > Secure flag). There's a few issues with this that I pointed out > previously and again, the change I made in SVN should bypass the whole > conversation. Snapshot tarballs with that change are available on our > downloads page. > > So if your change for some reason helps the problem, that'd be great to > know, but it may not change what we need to do (or have already done) on > our end. Also as previously suggested, please indicate what you see on screen and where -- is the folder list showing a "you must be logged in" error? What happens if you right-click that frame and select H and then R? -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-12 04:04:35
|
On Tue, May 11, 2021 5:14 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: > I have stumbled across these which appear to me to be related to the issue > I > brought to your attention: > > https://hacks.mozilla.org/2020/08/changes-to-samesite-cookie-behavior/ > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617609 Thanks, but as I said, you saw an *advisory warning* in the console and it should not have had anything to do with the problem. But if it is for some reason causing an issue, there is a change in SVN now that should eliminate any concerns about SameSite. > I have added our SM web address to the > 'network.cookie.sameSite.laxByDefault.disabledHosts' setting in FF. I > will > report if the logouts continue or not following this change. The warning seems to be pointing out the opposite, where what you want is Lax but it is currently using None (and thinks the cookies don't have the Secure flag). There's a few issues with this that I pointed out previously and again, the change I made in SVN should bypass the whole conversation. Snapshot tarballs with that change are available on our downloads page. So if your change for some reason helps the problem, that'd be great to know, but it may not change what we need to do (or have already done) on our end. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-05-11 17:15:03
|
I have stumbled across these which appear to me to be related to the issue I brought to your attention: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2020/08/changes-to-samesite-cookie-behavior/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617609 I have added our SM web address to the 'network.cookie.sameSite.laxByDefault.disabledHosts' setting in FF. I will report if the logouts continue or not following this change. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-10 20:20:42
|
>> You keep ignoring my suggestion to look at $check_mail_mechanism. Is >> the >> left/folder frame where the "must be logged in" message appears? >> Right-click in that frame, hit H then R to cause that frame only to >> reload >> and see if you are in fact logged out. If you're not, changing this >> setting may help. >> > > I am not ignoring you. I have a lot of more serious things that require > my > attention. SM's changed behaviour is an occasional annoyance, not a > problem. > > I reported it so that you would be aware of this behaviour and possibly > correlate it with other reports, if any. When I get a few spare moments > then I > will take a look at the things you suggest. However, I am constrained to > use > whatever version of SM the FreeBSD port maintainer chooses to release > regardless if a fix is found or not. > > In any case, I deeply suspect that culpability lies with FF and not SM. Ok, thank you for the report. Hope to hear from any others that may be seeing this. |
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-05-10 20:11:06
|
On Mon, May 10, 2021 12:28, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Somewhere the reply-to address for the list got butchered. Latest reply > from me: > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 3:09 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> What version of SM are you using? >> >> SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] >> >>> When was the date of the last time you installed it? >> >> pkg info squirrelmail-php73 >> squirrelmail-php73-20190904 >> Name : squirrelmail-php73 >> Version : 20190904 >> Installed on : Sat Mar 21 20:16:30 2020 EDT >> Origin : mail/squirrelmail >> Architecture : FreeBSD:12:* >> >>> Can you please update it? >> >> Not until and unless the FreeBSD port package is updated. > > You can download a nightly tarball from our downloads page and install it > in a parallel directory to see if it works any differently. > >>> When you are properly logged in, are the cookies shown to have the >>> HttpOnly and Secure attributes enabled? >> >> A screenshot of the FF storage inspector is attached. > > Ok, the cookies look secure when you are logged in. FYI I have a better > version of Quicksave that doesn't have such message size limitations as > when storing its data in cookies. > > You keep ignoring my suggestion to look at $check_mail_mechanism. Is the > left/folder frame where the "must be logged in" message appears? > Right-click in that frame, hit H then R to cause that frame only to reload > and see if you are in fact logged out. If you're not, changing this > setting may help. > I am not ignoring you. I have a lot of more serious things that require my attention. SM's changed behaviour is an occasional annoyance, not a problem. I reported it so that you would be aware of this behaviour and possibly correlate it with other reports, if any. When I get a few spare moments then I will take a look at the things you suggest. However, I am constrained to use whatever version of SM the FreeBSD port maintainer chooses to release regardless if a fix is found or not. In any case, I deeply suspect that culpability lies with FF and not SM. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-10 16:29:21
|
Somewhere the reply-to address for the list got butchered. Latest reply from me: On Mon, May 10, 2021 3:09 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: >> What version of SM are you using? > > SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] > >> When was the date of the last time you installed it? > > pkg info squirrelmail-php73 > squirrelmail-php73-20190904 > Name : squirrelmail-php73 > Version : 20190904 > Installed on : Sat Mar 21 20:16:30 2020 EDT > Origin : mail/squirrelmail > Architecture : FreeBSD:12:* > >> Can you please update it? > > Not until and unless the FreeBSD port package is updated. You can download a nightly tarball from our downloads page and install it in a parallel directory to see if it works any differently. >> When you are properly logged in, are the cookies shown to have the >> HttpOnly and Secure attributes enabled? > > A screenshot of the FF storage inspector is attached. Ok, the cookies look secure when you are logged in. FYI I have a better version of Quicksave that doesn't have such message size limitations as when storing its data in cookies. You keep ignoring my suggestion to look at $check_mail_mechanism. Is the left/folder frame where the "must be logged in" message appears? Right-click in that frame, hit H then R to cause that frame only to reload and see if you are in fact logged out. If you're not, changing this setting may help. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Ted H. <te...@io...> - 2021-05-10 00:46:25
|
Hey all, A question that I was unable to find an answer for. I had a user ask a question that I was unable to anser. When a message is placed into the drafts folder the date field is the date/time when the message was started not when it was actually sent. In his instance he started a message and saved it to his drafts folder, then picked up the message a week later when he actually completed and sent the message. The sent message showed the date/time when the message was started not when the message was actually sent. I'm running the squirrelmail package from the FreeBSD ports system. squirrelmail-php73-20200422 Can anyone tell me if this is the intended result or if I need to update to the newest version of the 1.43 stable branch to resolve the issue. Thanks, Ted Hatfield |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-08 03:46:09
|
On Fri, May 7, 2021 8:09 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: > > > On Fri, May 7, 2021 12:44, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >> Also go to Options --> Folder Preferences and make sure "Auto Refresh >> Folder List" is enabled. >> > Auto Refresh Folder List: 5 Minutes What about the other things I advised you to check? Please provide as much information as you can. > Today the logout occurred while I was inspecting the cookies. These > screenshots shows the storage state immediately after the logout. What version of SM are you using? When was the date of the last time you installed it? Can you please update it? When you are properly logged in, are the cookies shown to have the HttpOnly and Secure attributes enabled? What you show looks unorthodox. Are you serving the installation over HTTPS? Is it on the local network or remote? I'd also say you should try to keep terminals open tailing three log files: web server, PHP and IMAP server and see what the corresponding log data looks like. Cheers, -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-07 16:45:01
|
>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 6:30 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> It has happened several time since but I neglected to run the inspector >>> before >>> logging on to SM. Until today. This is what I found: >>> >>> Cookie �SQMSESSID� will be soon rejected because it has the >>> �SameSite� >>> attribute set to �None� or an invalid value, without the >>> �secure� >>> attribute. To >>> know more about the �SameSite� attribute, read >>> https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie/SameSite >> >> That's just a warning. It won't have anything to do with the logout. >> Try >> to see if you still have the SM cookies when it happens. And please try >> to better describe when/how it happens - there's nothing much to go on >> here. Was it as a result of the folder list refresh? Some other >> action? >> And as I suggested, please try to report on (and play with) the folder >> refresh config setting. >> > > I cannot recall it happening while I was in the middle of using SM, either > for > reading or composing. Generally, I leave the SM browser tab open, or nor, > with > FF open on the desktop (gnome/mate-FreeBSD-12.2) in the background. > Occasionally when I go to use SM I get the logged out notice and have to > log in > again. Also go to Options --> Folder Preferences and make sure "Auto Refresh Folder List" is enabled. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-05-07 15:57:05
|
On Fri, May 7, 2021 06:35, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 6:30 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: >> It has happened several time since but I neglected to run the inspector >> before >> logging on to SM. Until today. This is what I found: >> >> Cookie �SQMSESSID� will be soon rejected because it has the >> �SameSite� >> attribute set to �None� or an invalid value, without the �secure� >> attribute. To >> know more about the �SameSite� attribute, read >> https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie/SameSite > > That's just a warning. It won't have anything to do with the logout. Try > to see if you still have the SM cookies when it happens. And please try > to better describe when/how it happens - there's nothing much to go on > here. Was it as a result of the folder list refresh? Some other action? > And as I suggested, please try to report on (and play with) the folder > refresh config setting. > I cannot recall it happening while I was in the middle of using SM, either for reading or composing. Generally, I leave the SM browser tab open, or nor, with FF open on the desktop (gnome/mate-FreeBSD-12.2) in the background. Occasionally when I go to use SM I get the logged out notice and have to log in again. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-07 10:36:28
|
On Thu, May 6, 2021 6:30 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: > It has happened several time since but I neglected to run the inspector > before > logging on to SM. Until today. This is what I found: > > Cookie �SQMSESSID� will be soon rejected because it has the �SameSite� > attribute set to �None� or an invalid value, without the �secure� > attribute. To > know more about the �SameSite� attribute, read > https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie/SameSite That's just a warning. It won't have anything to do with the logout. Try to see if you still have the SM cookies when it happens. And please try to better describe when/how it happens - there's nothing much to go on here. Was it as a result of the folder list refresh? Some other action? And as I suggested, please try to report on (and play with) the folder refresh config setting. As for that warning, it looks like a bit of a bug in Firefox to me --- as I understand, the default should be Lax and not None. Furthermore, our cookies should be getting sent with the secure flag, assuming your site is served with SSL. I wouldn't expect Firefox to mix that up, but the cookies are all getting that flag attached as I see it. Moreover, if the default matched their docs, it would not cause this warning anyway. But I went ahead and added a 'strict' default for SameSite that should bypass all that. Pick it up in our next nightly snapshot or here are patches for 1.4.23: https://sourceforge.net/p/squirrelmail/code/14917/ Or 1.5.2: https://sourceforge.net/p/squirrelmail/code/14918/ -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php > On Tue, May 4, 2021 20:16, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2021 5:04 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users >> wrote: >>> I believe this to be a problem with Firefox (85.0.2 FreeBSD-12.2) and >>> not >>> with squirrelmail; for the simple reason that SM has not been updated >>> while FF has and the behaviour only recently became evident. >>> >>> However, I would like to know what is going on with FF and how to turn >>> it >>> off. If anyone here knows what is happening and how to prevent it I >>> would >>> appreciate having that information. >> >> Not really possible to guess what's happening without more description >> of >> the issue or debugging info. . . . > > > -- > *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** > Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail > Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy > Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail > > James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... > Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca > 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 > Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 > Canada L8E 3C3 > > |
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-05-06 18:31:10
|
It has happened several time since but I neglected to run the inspector before logging on to SM. Until today. This is what I found: Cookie SQMSESSID will be soon rejected because it has the SameSite attribute set to None or an invalid value, without the secure attribute. To know more about the SameSite attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie/SameSite On Tue, May 4, 2021 20:16, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Mon, May 3, 2021 5:04 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: >> I believe this to be a problem with Firefox (85.0.2 FreeBSD-12.2) and not >> with squirrelmail; for the simple reason that SM has not been updated >> while FF has and the behaviour only recently became evident. >> >> However, I would like to know what is going on with FF and how to turn it >> off. If anyone here knows what is happening and how to prevent it I would >> appreciate having that information. > > Not really possible to guess what's happening without more description of > the issue or debugging info. . . . -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-05-05 14:38:35
|
On Wed, May 5, 2021 03:43, Markus Robert Kessler wrote: > Hi James, hi Paul, > > maybe this is a cookie-problem within firefox. > > Could you please verify that the squirrelmail cookie is there and is valid > when you are logged out? I will check the browser's cookie cache the next time it happens. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |
From: Niclas A. <nic...@ho...> - 2021-05-05 08:33:11
|
Hi, FWIW: Years ago I had set my Squirrelmail login page as my browser start page, which automatically logged me out of SM whenever I started a new browser window. I suppose SM cleared its cookies not when logging in but when navigating to the login page. BR Niclas ________________________________ From: Markus Robert Kessler <jul...@di...> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 9:43 AM To: pa...@sq... <pa...@sq...>; Squirrelmail User Support Mailing List <squ...@li...> Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail Hi James, hi Paul, maybe this is a cookie-problem within firefox. Could you please verify that the squirrelmail cookie is there and is valid when you are logged out? BR, Markus > On Mon, May 3, 2021 5:04 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: >> I believe this to be a problem with Firefox (85.0.2 FreeBSD-12.2) and >> not >> with >> squirrelmail; for the simple reason that SM has not been updated while >> FF >> has >> and the behaviour only recently became evident. >> >> However, I would like to know what is going on with FF and how to turn >> it >> off. >> If anyone here knows what is happening and how to prevent it I would >> appreciate >> having that information. > > Not really possible to guess what's happening without more description of > the issue or debugging info. Watch the network debugging interface and > see if the folder list refreshes are happening and if not, why not. The > debug console should give you hints. I also recommend looking at what > your $check_mail_mechanism is -- I use "advanced" but "basic" can also > solve some refresh issues, though these only work if JavaScript is enabled > (in the config tool, that's 4 (General Options) ==> 21 (Auto check mail > mechanism) > > -- > Paul Lesniewski > SquirrelMail Team > Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! > http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php > > > > > > ----- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines > List address: squ...@li... > List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users > ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squ...@li... List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users |
From: Markus R. K. <jul...@di...> - 2021-05-05 08:14:42
|
Hi James, hi Paul, maybe this is a cookie-problem within firefox. Could you please verify that the squirrelmail cookie is there and is valid when you are logged out? BR, Markus > On Mon, May 3, 2021 5:04 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: >> I believe this to be a problem with Firefox (85.0.2 FreeBSD-12.2) and >> not >> with >> squirrelmail; for the simple reason that SM has not been updated while >> FF >> has >> and the behaviour only recently became evident. >> >> However, I would like to know what is going on with FF and how to turn >> it >> off. >> If anyone here knows what is happening and how to prevent it I would >> appreciate >> having that information. > > Not really possible to guess what's happening without more description of > the issue or debugging info. Watch the network debugging interface and > see if the folder list refreshes are happening and if not, why not. The > debug console should give you hints. I also recommend looking at what > your $check_mail_mechanism is -- I use "advanced" but "basic" can also > solve some refresh issues, though these only work if JavaScript is enabled > (in the config tool, that's 4 (General Options) ==> 21 (Auto check mail > mechanism) > > -- > Paul Lesniewski > SquirrelMail Team > Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! > http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php > > > > > > ----- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines > List address: squ...@li... > List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users > |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-05-05 00:17:38
|
On Mon, May 3, 2021 5:04 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > I believe this to be a problem with Firefox (85.0.2 FreeBSD-12.2) and not > with > squirrelmail; for the simple reason that SM has not been updated while FF > has > and the behaviour only recently became evident. > > However, I would like to know what is going on with FF and how to turn it > off. > If anyone here knows what is happening and how to prevent it I would > appreciate > having that information. Not really possible to guess what's happening without more description of the issue or debugging info. Watch the network debugging interface and see if the folder list refreshes are happening and if not, why not. The debug console should give you hints. I also recommend looking at what your $check_mail_mechanism is -- I use "advanced" but "basic" can also solve some refresh issues, though these only work if JavaScript is enabled (in the config tool, that's 4 (General Options) ==> 21 (Auto check mail mechanism) -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-05-04 19:11:57
|
I believe this to be a problem with Firefox (85.0.2 FreeBSD-12.2) and not with squirrelmail; for the simple reason that SM has not been updated while FF has and the behaviour only recently became evident. However, I would like to know what is going on with FF and how to turn it off. If anyone here knows what is happening and how to prevent it I would appreciate having that information. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-04-21 18:33:07
|
On Wed, April 21, 2021 2:56 pm, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Subject: Planning on setting up Postfix + Dovecot + Webmail + Apache + > MariaDB + PHP using Webmin Control Panel in the Cloud > > Good day from the Republic of Singapore, > > I am planning to setup Postfix Email Server + Dovecot IMAP/POP3 > Incoming Mail Server + Webmail (Roundcube or Squirrelmail) + Apache > Web Server + MariaDB Database Server + PHP using Webmin Control Panel > specifically, in the cloud, preferably Amazon EC2. > > Are there any very good and well written guides on doing this type of > setup? I personally don't care for guides and like to refer to the documentation for each product itself so you know what its possibilities are. Guides are great as a learning tool, but the authors often make choices for you. That doesn't have to be a bad thing, especially when the author helps you understand those decisions. In this day and age, I'd expect there are plenty of great guides. If you need help with SquirrelMail, just let us know. Please make sure to install the 1.4.23-svn snapshot from our downloads page. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Turritopsis D. T. En M. <ceo...@gm...> - 2021-04-21 14:56:28
|
Subject: Planning on setting up Postfix + Dovecot + Webmail + Apache + MariaDB + PHP using Webmin Control Panel in the Cloud Good day from the Republic of Singapore, I am planning to setup Postfix Email Server + Dovecot IMAP/POP3 Incoming Mail Server + Webmail (Roundcube or Squirrelmail) + Apache Web Server + MariaDB Database Server + PHP using Webmin Control Panel specifically, in the cloud, preferably Amazon EC2. Are there any very good and well written guides on doing this type of setup? I am looking forward to your reply. Thank you very much. Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, 43 years old as of 21 April 2021 Wed, is a TARGETED INDIVIDUAL (TI) living in Singapore. He is an IT Consultant with a System Integrator (SI)/computer firm in Singapore. He is an IT enthusiast. -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html ******************************************************************************************** Singaporean Targeted Individual Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017), in Taiwan (5 Aug 2019) and Australia (25 Dec 2019 to 9 Jan 2020): [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming -----END EMAIL SIGNATURE----- |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2021-03-21 21:51:53
|
>>> I get certain email from a particular sender that have a header as >>> below, and, that display as below: >> >> (reply based on receiving the actual email itself offlist) Also please note that the original plaintext-only message display *does* display the desired message contents below all the CSS text. You might not have scrolled down far enough to see. >> If you click on "View as HTML" you will see the message (requires >> view_as_html plugin in 1.4.x). The message text is off center in SM >> version 1.5.2 due to a namespace clash in the CSS (which I will fix >> soon), but it's still readable. It displays perfectly in SM version >> 1.4.23. > > what's the 'best' version to use, 1.4.x rather than 1.5.x ? That's up to you. I personally prefer 1.4.x > is there some update procedure, or it it simple a matter of d/l new > version, installing to a new directory and, change/set http path/link ? There are some differences between 1.4 and 1.5, so I would recommend a more careful manual upgrade. |
From: Voytek E. <vo...@sb...> - 2021-03-20 11:01:04
|
On Fri, March 19, 2021 6:45 pm, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> I get certain email from a particular sender that have a header as >> below, and, that display as below: > > (reply based on receiving the actual email itself offlist) Paul, thank you >If you click on "View as HTML" you will see the message (requires > view_as_html plugin in 1.4.x). The message text is off center in SM > version 1.5.2 due to a namespace clash in the CSS (which I will fix > soon), but it's still readable. It displays perfectly in SM version > 1.4.23. what's the 'best' version to use, 1.4.x rather than 1.5.x ? is there some update procedure, or it it simple a matter of d/l new version, installing to a new directory and, change/set http path/link ? V |
From: James B. B. <by...@ha...> - 2021-03-19 12:58:28
|
On Fri, March 19, 2021 02:51, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > The person or mailer software that sent it munged the original and that's > a problem on their side. > > You can just plug in the message to a base64 decoder and get the contents. > The part you included is the beginning of a HTML formatted message. > Which is what I did. The message appears to be auto-generated by a service ticket management application. It is doubtful that the actual sender has any control over it. Thanks, -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:By...@Ha... Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 |