Re: [SM-DEVEL] Seriously Dated Interface

[Solid I. <sol...@gm...>]

Hi Paul,

I suspected that my email would be received in a negative spirit. That’s
really not how it was intended.

I haven’t taken any serious look into SquirrelMail or its templating
capabilities. But I don’t really think “templating” is what the problem is.
Its more fundamental than that.

I'm not looking for a cute new "skin". I can't be the only one who sees a
significant functionally disparity between SquirrelMail and Gmail or
Outlook.com?

I suspect the response will be “*then use Gmail if I love it so much*” but
that’s not really the point is it?  The question I am asking is does SM
*intend* to compete in this space? If not then fine. But if so then what’s
it doing to address the glaring gap?

This was intended as constructive critique. Or we can just put our heads in
the sand and pretend everything is OK and that we can’t imagine why anyone
wouldn’t want to use anything other than Alpine anyway (oh, and BTW, I *do*
use Alpine too).

Best regards,
Solid Iron

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Paul Lesniewski <pa...@sq...>
wrote:

>
> You're welcome to use your vast experience to contribute a skin for
> SquirrelMail 1.5.2 where a templating layer was added.
>
> --
> Paul Lesniewski
> SquirrelMail Team
> Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail!
> http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php
>
>