Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail 1.50 no longer working after AMAVIS/CLAMAV

[Paul L. <pa...@sq...>]

Cameron Knowlton wrote:
> My squirrelmail has gone into hibernation. I'm running squirrelmail 
> 1.50, on OS X Server 10.3.6.
> 
> It used to work like a charm, until someone helped me upgrade my 
> system... I can't even recall everything that got updated, but the goal 
> was to install AMAVIS and CLAMAV.
> 
> Those installed *great*, I might add... but since then, my squirrelmail 
> hasn't worked.
> 
> I've reinstalled squirrelmail 1.50, no help.
> 
> When I try to access it, I see the cute little critter on the login 
> page. If I use an invalid username/password, it realizes that and 
> reports as such.
> 
> But, when I log in with a *valid* username and password, FireFox gives 
> the http error:
> 
> "
> The connection to www.igods.com:80 has terminated unexpectedly. Some 
> data may have been transferred.
> "
> 
> Safari has a slightly different error:
> "
> Safari can't open the page.
> Safari can't open the page 
> "https://www.igods.com:80/webmail/src/webmail.php" because it couldn't 
> establish a secure connection ro the server "www.igods.com"
> "
> 
> I have no idea why it's trying to hit httpS ... it should be http. I 
> can't find any setting in config.pl that points to httpS.
> 
> IE 5.1 reports:
> "
> Error
> Security failure. Data decryption error.
> "
> 
> My webmail is running at:
> 
> http://www.igods.com/webmail/
> 
> My server settings include:
> 
> A.  Update IMAP Settings   : localhost:143 (cyrus)
> B.  Update SMTP Settings   : localhost:25
> Truth be told, I have no idea why /webmail redirects to the webmail... I 
> don't recall setting that up, and I don't see it in my httpd settings 
> for the igods.com domain.
> 
> Any ideas?

Maybe Google does.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=ja&q=%22Data+decryption+error%22&btnG=Google+%E6%A4%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=

> p.s. any idea why the mass majority of mail that comes in from this list 
> has encoding errors? about 75% does... none of my other mail has that 
> problem.

Be more specific, although this is probably out of our control; you'd 
need to ask sf.net.

-paul