|
From: Rob M. <Rob...@co...> - 2006-02-09 16:16:53
|
Mark Neher wrote: > > Rob, I just tried this feature and set it to use the primary key > only. This didn't make a difference, unfortunately. I'll try to post > a table definition as a couple folks have suggested, but I probably > won't get a chance to do so for a couple days. BTW, our schema > contains some 300 tables, and I have only turned up a handful that > have this problem; most of them I can edit and update just fine. I > haven't been able to find a common thread among the ones that fail... Yes, the table definition will be useful ( also a test row that fails would be very useful as well) That would allow us to step through the code and see exactly what is happening. Rob |
