|
From: Christian G. <chr...@di...> - 2010-02-01 18:24:46
|
Hi Rob, I tried the snapshot. The update statements do their jobs. Thanks! Unfortunately our DB2-System is at version 9.1 and JDBC 4.0 is supported from DB2 version 9.5. @all: Can someone else try this workaround? Christian 2010/1/31 Robert Manning <rob...@gm...>: > Christian, > > I just applied the patch (minus the redundant DB2 custom types). In > the end I decided to replace all occurrences with getColumnName since > I do not have a system against which to test. Try the latest snapshot > : > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/squirrel-sql/files/3-snapshots/Snapshot-20100131_2249/squirrel-sql-Snapshot-20100131_2249-install.jar/download > > Let us know whether or not it addresses the issue. > > Rob > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Robert Manning > <rob...@gm...> wrote: >> Thanks for confirming that Christian - I suspected that but I wanted >> to have another look to be sure. We will take care of this issue >> before the 3.1 release in February and when we do there will be a >> snapshot that you (and others who might be interested in the impact of >> this change) to try out. >> >> Rob >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Christian Gruenberg >> <chr...@di...> wrote: >>>>> I also think that if we do this in core, then probably >>>>> most if not all of Christian's custom DB2 datatypes are unnecessary. >>>>> I skimmed over them so it is possible that I missed something but they >>>>> seemed to be merely overriding the core implementation of >>>>> getWhereClauseValue() and the like in *DataTypeComponent. I'll take >>>>> another look. >>> >>> You are right, they are unnecessary now if you'll corret the basic datatypes. >>> >>> Christain >>> >> > |
