|
From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2010-02-01 18:40:13
|
Excellent. By the way, I have looked around to see what is involved with acquiring a system on which to run DB2 for mainframe (z/OS, OS/390, OS/400, etc). It seems that there was a company/product (FLEX-ES) that was authorized to sell emulation software that would allow you to host a mainframe OS (and possibly DB2) on cheap hardware (intel PC). I read that IBM chose not to continue their license, and now the only way to legally setup a test system is to buy expensive hardware and monthly license to the OS. I've seen Hercules w/ public domain mainframe OS, but I guess that I probably would not be able to run DB2 on it. Am I missing something or is this the real deal with IBM ? Rob On 2/1/10, Christian Gruenberg <chr...@di...> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > I tried the snapshot. The update statements do their jobs. Thanks! > > Unfortunately our DB2-System is at version 9.1 and JDBC 4.0 is > supported from DB2 version 9.5. > @all: Can someone else try this workaround? > > Christian > > > 2010/1/31 Robert Manning <rob...@gm...>: > > Christian, > > > > I just applied the patch (minus the redundant DB2 custom types). In > > the end I decided to replace all occurrences with getColumnName since > > I do not have a system against which to test. Try the latest snapshot > > : > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/squirrel-sql/files/3-snapshots/Snapshot-20100131_2249/squirrel-sql-Snapshot-20100131_2249-install.jar/download > > > > Let us know whether or not it addresses the issue. > > > > Rob > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Robert Manning > > <rob...@gm...> wrote: > >> Thanks for confirming that Christian - I suspected that but I wanted > >> to have another look to be sure. We will take care of this issue > >> before the 3.1 release in February and when we do there will be a > >> snapshot that you (and others who might be interested in the impact of > >> this change) to try out. > >> > >> Rob > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Christian Gruenberg > >> <chr...@di...> wrote: > >>>>> I also think that if we do this in core, then probably > >>>>> most if not all of Christian's custom DB2 datatypes are unnecessary. > >>>>> I skimmed over them so it is possible that I missed something but they > >>>>> seemed to be merely overriding the core implementation of > >>>>> getWhereClauseValue() and the like in *DataTypeComponent. I'll take > >>>>> another look. > >>> > >>> You are right, they are unnecessary now if you'll corret the basic datatypes. > >>> > >>> Christain > >>> > >> > > > |
