Re: [Squeak-VMdev] SourceForge or SqueakForge?

[<gor...@bl...>]

Hi all!

Bert Freudenberg <be...@im...> wrote:
> Am 11.11.2004 um 16:29 schrieb gor...@bl...:
> 
> > But first things first - are everyone agreed on moving SF CVS to
> > squeakfoundation.org CVS?
> 
> May I amend this proposal to move SF CVS over to SqF SVN?

Hehe, this is where we started - that was Tim's question/proposal. :) My
point with first just moving CVS to our own server is that it should be
simple to do and non-disruptive. Changing system will disrupt things,
*whichever* system we choose. For example, the CVS GUI clients that
people may be using today, or scripts people have will not work.

> If we want to move the repository at all (and I think we want), then 

Yes, I think we all agree on moving at least. :)

> that would be the perfect time to "upgrade". Subversion seems to be 
> very similar to CVS, but fixing its major flaws.

Yes, but I have also read that it adds a few new flaws as well. But
sure, all in all it is probably a step up from CVS no matter what. I
just thought Darcs seemed so interesting and nice that I put it forward
as an interesting venue.

> Btw, we will also need two new mailing lists (vmdev and commit).

Right.

> - Bert -

regards, Göran