Re: [Squeak-VMdev] SourceForge or SqueakForge?

[<gor...@bl...>]

Hi all!

"Andreas Raab" <and...@gm...> wrote:
> > AFAIK Darcs/Monotone doesn't limit us in that regard - I mean, we can
> > just decide what is the "official" repo.
> > In fact, there is nothing different from today - I could set up my own
> > Squeak CVS and the confusion about which one is official would still
> > exist.
> 
> That's not my understanding of "decentral" then.

Eh... my point is that there is nothing stopping us from declaring a
single repository as the official repository if we use Darcs.

> > Why don't we just move the CVS repo first, that way we at least get away
> > from the restricitions on SF?
> > Then we can always look at changing system after that, but then there is
> > no real hurry. Deal?
> 
> This sounds good to me.

Good.

regards, Göran