Re: [Squeak-VMdev] SourceForge or SqueakForge?

[Bert F. <be...@im...>]

Am 11.11.2004 um 11:47 schrieb go...@kr...:

> Hi again!
>
> (Sending only to the squeak-vmdev list, I think all are there possibly
> for the exception of Cees)
>
> "Andreas Raab" <and...@gm...> wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> Both of the above are thumbs-down from my POV. Darcs just seems ...  
>> odd and
>> there isn't much to read about "how it works" (if you have a good url  
>> for
>> the "theory of patches" I'd be interested in finding out more).
>
> http://www.darcs.net/manual/node9.html
>
> Anyway, I still think darcs looks pretty darn interesting to test. But
> as I said, we can and should move the CVS repo first "as is".
>
> Someone already did this a while back - but since there was no
> announcement or anything it kinda "got lost". Who did it and could that
> someone do it again? :)

I didn't, but in principle you just need to copy the nightly tarball  
from

	http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/squeak-cvsroot.tar.bz2

It's described here

	http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php? 
docid=768&group_id=1#nightlytarballs


- Bert -