Re: [Squeak-VMdev] SourceForge or SqueakForge?

[<go...@kr...>]

Hi again!

(Sending only to the squeak-vmdev list, I think all are there possibly
for the exception of Cees)

"Andreas Raab" <and...@gm...> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Both of the above are thumbs-down from my POV. Darcs just seems ... odd and
> there isn't much to read about "how it works" (if you have a good url for
> the "theory of patches" I'd be interested in finding out more).

http://www.darcs.net/manual/node9.html

Anyway, I still think darcs looks pretty darn interesting to test. But
as I said, we can and should move the CVS repo first "as is".

Someone already did this a while back - but since there was no
announcement or anything it kinda "got lost". Who did it and could that
someone do it again? :)

regards, Göran