Re: [Squeak-VMdev] Versiojn 4 changes

[Andreas R. <and...@gm...>]

> The last two (maybe three) attempts at jitter did precisely this (the 
> flag was called by exactly that name).  It was less important for the 
> primitives than it was for internal mechanisms (such as flushing a 
> volatile context into the heap during return, which is a real pain if 
> you have to keep every single pointer remappable over every context 
> allocation when flushing).

I take that as a clear "yes", right?! ;-)

Cheers,
  - Andreas