From: Andreas R. <and...@gm...> - 2004-04-08 00:39:19
|
> While it probably won't impact speed on a decent implementation of the > CPU (the additional branch will be predicted correctly) it won't > increase speed either (you haven't reduced the overall number of data > hazards the pipeline has to deal with). Which reminds of something else we were talking about in the past: Passing primitive arguments as C arguments instead of the Smalltalk stack. I remember that you said that this would be advantageous for various reasons and since it requires changing the plugins and a lot of other stuff, V4 might be a chance to give this "more serious thoughts". Cheers, - Andreas |