|
From: Tim R. <ti...@su...> - 2002-09-27 00:03:35
|
In message <Pin...@ti...>
Ian Piumarta <ian...@in...> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Tim Rowledge wrote:
>
> > That seems to have been the thrust of his claims. Of course, it
> > completely ignores any other kind of cpu or device.
>
> My particular device isn't impressed in the slightest.
>
> stock #(40788 315749 84660 44396 0 25997 14762) Total 526352
> crosby #(42534 370191 100559 49918 0 28470 16948) Total 608620
>
> Forget it. Go spend your time on something worthwile.
John did a quick test run on OS-X (since I can't make a non-debug vm
that actually runs - very wierd) and concluded that there is no
noticable benefit on OS-X either. SO, scratch that particular
'enhancement'. I have to admit to being a little surprised, since
normally one might expect some benefit from a bigger cache. Ah, well,
details, details.
tim
--
Tim Rowledge, ti...@su..., http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
"How many Kdatlyno does it take to change a lightbulb?" "None. It sounds perfectly OK to them."
|