|
From: Ian P. <ian...@in...> - 2002-09-14 19:42:40
|
Tim, > Just to keep y'all up to date, the Acorn has no performance change at > all on the 'Smalltalk macroBenchmarks' when using the crosby cache > stuff. It does however seem to require a bunch more memory to achieve > that same performance.... Want to send me the change set? I'll file it in, rebuild and run the benchmarks. From what I remember of his posts he's talking about subtle effects (cache line invalidation cost) that are rather specific to his processor (some flavour of pentium clone) -- unless I'm reading _completely_ the wrong thread? This is pretty inspirational stuff! Unfortunately, what it inspires is a resounding "who the f**k cares?". His cpu might have a broken cache architecture, mine doesn't. (And given your results it would seem the ARM doesn't either.) Cheers, Ian |